頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Can We Paradigm? Re-examining the Mimetic Heresy and Some Other Imbroglios in Recent Western-language Academic Studies of Modern Chinese Literature |
---|---|
作 者 | Williams,Philip F. C.; | 書刊名 | Tamkang Review |
卷 期 | 30:3 民89.春 |
頁 次 | 頁111-148 |
分類號 | 820.908 |
關鍵詞 | Poststructuralism; Feudalism; Ambiguous terminology; Variant editions; Saussurean linguistics; Mimesis; Hypotheses and theories; Saidian orientalism; Bowdlerized texts; Bibliographical standards; Resistance to theory; Referential Anxiety; Illusory closed systems; Eurasian rivalries; Logical fallacies; Intellectual skepticism; Hegemonism; Conceptual absolutism; Gramscian subversion; Evidential research; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | This article summarizes some key achievements in the field of modern Chinese literary studies in the West, while pointing to areas where major deficiencies remain One major problem is the common poststructuralist assumption that literature and language are “closed” systems of a purely self-reflexive sort; complex and fascinating mimetic aspects of literature are hence often overlooked or even scornfully dismissed. This mimetic heresy or referential anxiety is a symptom of a larger problem: the tendency to accept the positions of a Western academic literary “authority” like Jameson or Said largely on faith, instead of subjecting even the most popular academic hypotheses to critical scholarly scrutiny A more critical approach to handling ambiguous interpretive terminology and variant editions would also improve the field’s long-term intellectual standing and its prospects for broadening its interdisciplinary reach. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。