查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 入學方式對學生入學後成績表現之影響=Influences of Different Entrance Channels on Recruited Students' Performance |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳一如; 李弘斌; | 書刊名 | 技術學刊 |
卷 期 | 15:3 2000.09[民89.09] |
頁 次 | 頁423-430 |
分類號 | 527.11 |
關鍵詞 | 多元入學; 一般聯招入學; 推薦甄選入學; Multiple entrance channels; Joint entrance examination mode; Recommendation-selection mode; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究將近年來經由各種多元管道入學二年制及五年制專科學校後,入學方式之差異對學生成績之影響作一探討及比較。在過去,多元入學二專之管道最主要有高職畢結業生甄試保送(約佔百分之二十)及一般聯招(約佔百分之八十)兩種;而多元入學五專之管道則有推甄選入學(約佔百分之八十)兩種;而多元入學五專之管道則有推薦甄選入學(約佔百分之四十)、自學方案入學(約佔百分之二)、體育績優保送生(約佔百分之一)及一般聯招(約佔百分之六十)等。本文將以主要經由多元入學管道的兩類學生:經由保送甄試/推薦甄選入學及經由一般聯招入學進入景文技術學院二專部及五專部之學生為對象,利用兩獨立母體平均數差異的假設檢定,探討分析其入學後成績之表現與入學方式之關聯性,研究的結果可研判多元入學方案是否真能提供學生一較佳的選擇,以符合學生求學之志趣及性向。 |
英文摘要 | The influence of the different entrance channels on recruited five-year and two-year junior college students' academic performance are studied in this paper. The entrance routes to two-year junior college included joint entrance examination (~80%) and qualification-examination (~20%). For the five-year junior college, the main entrance routes included joint entrance examination (~60%) and recommendation-selection (~40%). In this paper, students taking different routes to two-year and five-year junior colleges were chosen to study. Hypothesis tests for two independent populations were used to verify whether multiple entrance channels offer better entrance procedures for two-year and five-year junior colleges. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。