頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 都市永續性偵測工具之研究--以臺中都會區永續發展指標為例=A Study on the Measurement Tool of Urban Sustainability: Sustainable Indicators in Taichung Metropolitan Area |
---|---|
作 者 | 李永展; 張曉婷; | 書刊名 | 社會文化學報 |
卷 期 | 8 1999.06[民88.06] |
頁 次 | 頁155-188 |
專 輯 | 臺灣之永續發展 |
分類號 | 545.5 |
關鍵詞 | 永續性; 永續性偵測工具; 永續發展指標; Sustainability; Measurement tool of sustainability; Sustainable indicator; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 許多永續性偵測工具均明白指出,地球生態系已經無法承受現階段經濟活動和物質消耗的程度,而人類持續進行的「過度消費」行為與「無效率」的生產方式,將更加速自然資本、社會資本與經濟資本的提早耗竭。本文即利用永續發展指標驗證台中都會區之永續性,其中八個預警指標十年來之趨勢分析結果顯示,台中都會區近年來一些永續性因子邁向永續的速度趨緩而背離永續的速度加快。如果任由此種情況持續進行,則在台中都會特性逐漸形成之際,必將逐漸邁向不永續發展,此亦說明都市化不僅是單純的經濟學或是人口統計學的現象,更代表著人類生態學與社會學上的轉變。永續發展指標即以整合性的觀點檢測都市之成長軌跡,而瞭解自然環境、人類社會與經濟體系間的巨大轉變,則是永續發展的重要關鍵。 此外,經本文之實證結果,永續發展指標雖仍不免囿於政治惰性、資料鴻溝、指標複雜性、及指標應用限制等主客觀因素之影響,但並不意謂著永續性之行動能就此鬆動;相反地,更應思索如何建構永續發展之預警指標,以解決未來不永續之困境,而於全國、區域、都市、與地方之不同空間尺度下,建構符合地方特色之永續發展指標,方能真正實淺「全球思考、草根行動」之永續願景。 |
英文摘要 | Many measurement tools of sustainability indicate that the ecosystem cannot sustain current economic activities and material consumption. Furthermore, the continuing "over-consumption" behavior and "in-efficient" production will accelerate the depletion of natural, social, and economic capitals. This paper therefore uses sustainable indicators to measure sustainability in Taichung metropolitan area. The result of the eight sustainable indicators shows that some sustainable factors are gradually becoming unsustainable. If this trend continues, while the Taichung metropolitan area is gradually growing, the metropolitan area will eventually become more unsustainable. This indicates that urbanization is not only a phenomenon of economy or demography, but also a transformation of human ecology and sociology. Sustainable indicators, adopting a holistic perspective, can be used to measure the trend of urban growth pattern. As a result, understanding the great transformation of natural environment, human society, and economic systems becomes a critical factor. Our research findings indicate that sustainable indicators are still affected by factors such as political inertia, data gap, indicator complexity, and constraint of indicators. However, this does not mean that sustainable activities should be abandoned. On the contrary, the precautionary indicators should be established to solve sustainability dilemmas. Moreover, in the different spatial scales of nation, region, urban, and locality, the construction of sustainable indicators which meets local needs can really fulfill the sustainable vision of "thinking globally, acting locally." |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。