查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Effects of Induction Anesthetic Agents on Outcome of Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Comparison of Propofol and Thiopental Sodium
- 比較Propofol與Thiopental Sodium於施行人工協助生殖技術麻醉誘導時之使用對預後結果之影響
- 我要作人工生殖(治療手冊)(2)--試管嬰兒篇
- Massive Intraabdominal Bleeding after Transvaginal Ultrasound-Guided Oocyte Retrieval
- 人工協助生殖技術管理辦法之擬訂及其內容
- 人工協助生殖技術新知
- 人工協助生殖技術管理辦法簡介
- Sono guided oocyte recovery: A simple and effective method
- Transvaginal Ultrasound-Directed Oocyte Retrieval for in Vitro Fertilization
- 不孕症治療之新進展
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Effects of Induction Anesthetic Agents on Outcome of Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Comparison of Propofol and Thiopental Sodium=於人工協助生殖技術全身麻醉誘導時Propofol與Thiopental Sodium對預後結果之影響 |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃宣為; 黃富仁; 龔福財; 蔡孟穎; 林浩; 張旭陽; 許雅秀; 張學文; | 書刊名 | 長庚醫學 |
卷期 | 23:9 2000.09[民89.09] |
頁次 | 頁513-519 |
分類號 | 416.5 |
關鍵詞 | 人工協助生殖技術; 取卵; 得普利麻; 必托生; Assisted reproductive technology; Oocyte retrieval; Propofol; Thiopental sodium; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | Background. The use of propofol, as compared to barbiturates (e.g. thiopental), for short surgical procedures has been associated with more rapid recovery from the procedure. Propofol, an intravenous anesthetic drug, is frequently used as an adjunct to transvaginal oocyte retrieval but little is known about its effects upon fertilization, embryo development, and pregnancy rate when used drug the for induction of general anesthesia. This study was conducted to compare the outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART) with the use of propofol versus thiopental sodium for the induction of general anesthesia during oocyte retrieval. Methods. In this retrospective study, 92 cases of infertile patients who underwent oocyte retrieval under the induction of general anesthesia with, respectively, either propofol (Group I, 72 cases) or thiopental sodium (Group II, 20 cases) were compared for fertilization rate, cleavage rate, and pregnancy rate Results. The fertilization rate was 68.9% for Group I and 66.7% for group II (p=0.614). The cleavage rate was 96.5% for Group I and 94.8% for Group II (p=0.294). The rate of good embryo grading and poor embryo grading was, respectively, 85.1% and 14.9% for Group I, versus 85.7% and 14.3% for Group II (p=0.887). The pregnancy rate was 30.5% for Group I and 20.0% for Group II (p=0.354). The implantation rate and abortion rate was, respectively, 9.1% and 18.2% for Group I versus 7.2% and 25.0% for Group II (implantation rate, p=0.590; abortion rate, p=0.600). Conclusion. There were no significant differences between these two groups for fertilization rate, cleavage rate, pregnancy rate, implantation rate and abortion rate. We suggest cautious use of propofol for the procedure of oocyte retrieval despite its associated more rapid post-operative recovery including less nausea/vomiting. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。