查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 第三波民主潮下之憲政改革--臺灣與捷克比較=Constitutional Reforms of the Third Wave of Democratization--A Comparison of Taiwan and Czech |
---|---|
作者 | 魏千峰; Wei, Chien-feng; |
期刊 | 思與言 |
出版日期 | 20000300 |
卷期 | 38:1 2000.03[民89.03] |
頁次 | 頁1-44 |
分類號 | 581.25 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 第三波民主潮; 制(修)憲原則; 社會主義憲政; 權力分立; 國際人權入憲; 一機關二階段修憲; 憲政文化; 憲法化魅力; 公平儲蓄原則; 新開端; 憲政時刻; The third wave of democratization; Priciples of Constitutional-making; Socialist constitutionalism; Separation of powers; International bill of rights; Constitutional-amending of one organization and two stages; Constitutional culture; Constitutionatization of charisma; Just saving principle; New beginning; Constututional moment; |
中文摘要 | 一九九○年前後,前東歐共黨國家(包括捷克)及臺灣等威權國家 邁向民主化,掀起第三波民主潮之高峰,惟臺灣在國際上雖被認為開 發中國家中經濟成長、政治自由化頗有成就的國家,但自一九八七年 臺灣解除戒嚴後,歷經五次修憲,卻未將憲政改革推展至令人滿意之 地步。而在地球另一端的捷克,於共黨政權崩潰後,針對本身之歷史社 經背景,仿效美國及德國憲政,建立權力分立及國際人權習慣法入憲, 在比較憲政上頗有可觀之處。本文介紹第三波民主潮之概念、制憲(修 憲)原則及捷克、臺灣兩國憲政改革之情況,並評析我國憲政之缺失, 期待在此總統之選之際,提供國外成功經驗,以供關心我國憲政前途 之士參考。 |
英文摘要 | Before and after 1990, the Former East-Europe communist countries (including Czech) and Taiwan those undemocratic countries marched toward democratization. It rose the summit of the third wave of democratization. Although Taiwan has high economic growth and good political freedom, she has not made a success of constitutional reform after five Constitutional Law-amendings. Czech, on other corner of the earth, focused her own histoical, political and economical conditions to learn constitutional experiences from U.S. and West Germany. She establised the separation of powes and let international bill of rights into her Constitutional Law. This essay introduces the concepts of the third wave of democratization, priciples of constitutional-making and comparison constitutional reforms of Czech and Taiwan. The writer hope it can provide foreign constitutional experiences for the future constitutional reforms of Taiwan. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。