查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- The Effect of Incentive Spirometry on Chest Expansion and Breathing Work in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Airway Diseases: Comparison of Two Methods
- A Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programme Improves Lung Functional Capacity and Reduces Hospital Care Cost in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease (COAD) and Mucus Hypersecretion
- Improvement of Outcomes and Tapering off Corticosteroids in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease Using Spirometry Measurements
- 誘發性深呼吸器於手術病人之運用
- A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Salmeterol Accuhaler and Ipratropium in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Direct Tracheobronchial Suction for Massive Post-Extubation Atelectasis in Premature Infants
- A Home Walking Rehabilitation Program Improves Exercise Tolerance and Dyspnea Sensation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease (COAD)
- 慢性阻塞性呼吸道疾病(COPD)急性惡化之藥物治療
- 降低開胸手術病人使用誘發性肺計量器不完整率改善方案
- 間歇正壓呼吸治療對於長期使用呼吸器病人在肺生理功能的短期效益
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | The Effect of Incentive Spirometry on Chest Expansion and Breathing Work in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Airway Diseases: Comparison of Two Methods=慢性阻塞性呼吸道疾病患者使用誘導性肺量計肺擴張與呼吸作功之成效:兩種不同類型的比較 |
---|---|
作 者 | 何淑娟; 江玲玲; 鄭涵方; 林慧珍; 盛德芳; 郭漢彬; 林鴻銓; | 書刊名 | 長庚醫學 |
卷 期 | 23:2 2000.02[民89.02] |
頁 次 | 頁73-79 |
分類號 | 415.41 |
關鍵詞 | 慢性阻塞性呼吸道疾病; 誘導性肺量計; 肺擴張; 呼吸作功; Chronic obstructive airway diseases; Incentive spirometry; Chest expansion; Breathing work; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | Background. Chronic obstructive airway diseases (COAD), characterized by mucus hypersecretion, lead to exercise intolerance. Incentive spirometry has been used to prevent post-operative pulmonary atelectasis. Methods. To compare the efficacy of two incentive spirometers, Coach (volume- oriented) and Triflo (flow-oriented), in the work of breathing in COAD patients, 22 patients were randomized in this study: 12 patients (Triflo-II group) initially used Triflo-II for 10 minutes and then Coach for the same period. In contrast, the Coach group, including 10 patients, started with Coach followed by Triflo-II. After receiving incentive spirometry, lung expansion and work of breathing were assessed. Results. Patients in the Coach group significantly increased chest wall expansion (p=0.041), as compared with patients using Triflo-II. Similarly, there was also a significantly increased abdominal wall expansion in the Coach group (p=0.0056), compared with that in the Triflo-II group. The need of accessory muscle assistance for breathing in the Coach group was significantly less than in the Triflo-II group (p=0.047). It was easier for patients in the Coach group to start a breath (p=0.0058) than for those in the Triflo-II group. For the entire group, 17 patients (77.3%) preferred Coach to assist their breathing, and only 4 patients (18.2%) favored Triflo- II. Conclusion. COAD patients achieved a larger expansion of the chest and abdomen with a Coach device. Our data provide a good rationale for an outcome study on the use of incentive spirometer in COAD patients. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。