頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Replication of Experiments Versus Duplication of Results in Scientific Publication=實驗重做與結果再現 |
---|---|
作 者 | 張固剛; | 書刊名 | 醫學研究 |
卷 期 | 20:1 1999.08[民88.08] |
頁 次 | 頁1-6 |
分類號 | 300 |
關鍵詞 | 發表論文; 重覆發表; 科學文獻; Publication; Redundant report; Duplicate presentation; Scientific information; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 在本文中,作者由生化期刊中摘舉數例以說明科學論文發表時疑似重覆之處。 在每一案例中,分別由實驗重做或結果再用觀點分析。由這些案例中讀者可以體會在一篇論文中,材料與方法部份前後論文重覆事實上無法避免。但在以後論文中,文字應儘量濃縮。同一實驗結果不應重覆使用。但在不同期刊發表面對不同讀者群時允許作者灌輸同一重要觀念。此時應適應不同背景讀者修改文句內容。有效並經濟使用篇幅為首要。 |
英文摘要 | Examples of redundancy in scientific publications are taken from literature. Each case is analyzed in terms of the replication of experiments versus the duplication of results. The former sometimes is essential but the latter should be avoided. These examples will give the readers a clear account of replication in literature. I hope that this discussion will help readers to avoid duplicate usage of expeimental data in their own writing. While repetition of the Materials and Methods part in a paper is inevitable, it should be condensed and rephrased. Duplication of results in different papers is usually not allowed. However, the restatement of an important theory in different publications to a supposedly different group of readers is permissible. In this case, the sentences should be reconstructed to suit the different levels of the readers. Economy in the use of scientific forum should be always kept in mind in writing a scientific report. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。