查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 崔述與顧頡剛疑古歷程的比較研究=The Study of Comparison of Suspicion Ancient History between Ts'ui Shu and Ku Chieh Kang |
---|---|
作 者 | 邱麗娟; | 書刊名 | 臺南師院學報 |
卷 期 | 32 1999.06[民88.06] |
頁 次 | 頁271-295 |
分類號 | 782.87、782.87 |
關鍵詞 | 崔述; 顧頡剛; 疑古學派; Ts'ui Shu; Ku Chieh Kang; Suspicion ancient history; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 崔述與顧頡剛是兩位相隔百餘年,對於辨偽古史皆具貢獻的學者,兩者研究古史 的目的與方法,乃至學術際遇各有不同。崔述生長於尊崇儒學的清代,秉持了「尊經衛道」 的理念,在相信<六經>為信史的前提下,對於歷代的古籍進行考證,藉此維持儒家經典的 原意、固守儒學闡述的道統。顧頡剛則是處於民國初年激烈反傳統的時代,他為了挑戰儒學 的權威,打破黃金古代的迷夢,不信<六經>的可靠性,而對傳統古史系統持提出質疑,重 新探究史書所載的真偽。崔述因疑古太過,其論述不為當時學者接受,直至民初他的研究價 值才受到學者的稱許。顧頡剛則是疑古理論一提出,即聲名大譟,引起學者熱烈討論。崔、 顧兩人研究古史的方法雖有爭議之處,但他們能勇於批判、懷疑古書,則提供後人一個重新 看待古史的角度與視野。 |
英文摘要 | Ts'ui Shu (1740-1816) and Ku Chieh kang made much contribution in discriminating the truth of ancient history. In Ching Dynasty, Ts'ui Shu and his era people respected Confucianism and their classics, but, when Ts'ui Shu found the classics was misunderstood, he decided to discriminate them in order to maintain the original significance in Confucian classics. The historical background of Ku Chieh Kang was sharp anti-tradition in the early days of the Republic of Chin. In order to challenge the authority of Confucianism, and to break the myth of golden ancient history, he doubted the system of ancient history, and reconsidered the record of classics. Although the study method of Ts'ui Shu and Ku Chieh Kang was controversial, they dared to doubt the record of history, giving a new vision of research ancient history for later learners. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。