查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 臺灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷量尺語詞的選擇
- 同質團體與異質團體在選擇量表量尺語詞上的比較研究
- 閩南語版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷中量尺語詞之選擇
- 臺灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展簡介
- 臺灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展與應用
- 脊髓損傷生活品質問卷之發展
- 如何設計一份特定疾病所適用之生活品質問卷--以愛滋病患為例
- 華人傳統醫療作效果評估之可能困難及解決之道
- Development and Verification of Validity and Reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan Version
- Factor Construct of Health-related Quality of Life in Taiwanese Workers by WHOQOL-BREF Questionnaire
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 臺灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷量尺語詞的選擇=Scale Descriptor Selection for Taiwan-version of Questionnaire of World Health Organization Quality of Life |
---|---|
作 者 | 林茂榮; 姚開屏; 黃景祥; 王榮德; | 書刊名 | 中華公共衛生雜誌 |
卷 期 | 18:4 1999.08[民88.08] |
頁 次 | 頁262-270 |
分類號 | 412.192 |
關鍵詞 | 生活品質; 量尺語詞; 世界衛生組織; Quality of life; Scale descriptor; World Health Organization; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 目標:本研究經由一群醫療衛生相關專家的討論,以及156位志願受訪者的問卷訪談結果,來選取台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷中所需用的20個量尺語詞。方法:世界衛生組織生活品質問卷的量尺語詞的種類包括能力、頻率、強度以及評估四類,每類須含有五個序位量尺語詞。選擇語詞的順序是先由專家討論決定序位量尺語詞的二個端點的用詞,再由問卷訪談選取中間三個序位量尺語詞。問卷中每個候選量尺語詞的二個端點之間有一條10公分線段,讓選自台灣地區10家大型醫院的156位受訪者標示每個候選量尺語詞相對於二個端點用詞的語氣程度。結果:選出的能力量尺 語詞為「完全不能」、「少許能」、「中等程度能」、「很能」及「完全能」;頻率量尺語詞為「從來沒有」、「不常有」、「一半有一半沒有」、「很常有」及「一直都有」;強度量尺語詞為「完全沒有」、「有一點有」、「中等程度有」、「很有」及「極有」;評估量尺語詞為「極不滿意」、「不滿意」、「中等程度滿意」、「滿意」及「極滿意」。被選出之量尺語詞前後測的信度普通,語詞之間有些差異;而前後測平均值並無統計上的明顯差異。結論:本研究選出的序位量尺語詞應可符合台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷及其他類似問卷之需要。 |
英文摘要 | Objectives: This study is to select appropriate descriptors for Taiwan-version of World Health Organization quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL). Methods: WHOQOL consists of four kinds of response scales: capacity, frequency, intensity, and evaluation. Each response scale has five ordinal descriptors including two anchors at extreme levels and three intermediates. We invited experts to decide the two anchors for extreme levels, and then selected 156 outpatients and healthy persons from 10 hospitals in Ta iwan to place each descriptor on a 10 centimeter line according to where they think each descriptor lies in relation to the two anchors. Results: Five most appropriate Chinese descriptors were "Completely not" (完全不能), "A little" (少許能), "Moderately" (中等程度能), "Very" (很能) and "Completely" (完全能) for capacity; "Never" (從來沒有), "Seldom" (不常有), "Half" (一半有一半沒有), "Very often" (很常有) and "Always" (一直都有) for frequency; "Completely not"(完全沒有), "Slightly" (有一點有), "Moderat ely" (中等程度有), "Very much" (很有) and "Extremely" (極有) for intensity; and "Extremely dissatisfied" (極不滿意), "Dissatisfied "(不滿意), "Moderately satisfied" (中等程度滿意), "Satisfied" (滿意) and "Extremely satisfied" (極滿意) for evaluation. Test-retest reliability was moderate on the average but varied among descriptors. However, there were no differences between their mean values of test and retest. Conclusions: These selected descriptors are suitable for Taiwan-version of WHOQOL and other use of health profile assessment of quality of life. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。