查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 性別、產業型態及創造經驗與創意相關的個人特質、家庭及學校因素之關係
- 影響科技與資訊產業人員創意發展的因素之量表編製
- 影響國小學童科技創意發展的因素之量表發展
- 青少年中輟相關因素及社會不良適應關聯性之研究
- 國小單、雙親兒童之學校適應與其「個人特質」、「家庭特性」之關係研究
- 國中學生創造力特質與家庭、學校氣氛關係之研究
- 個人特質、家庭環境、教師教學與學校背景對八年級學生數學成就之影響
- 從美國教育券之實施論我國教育券政策
- 我國參與國際物理與化學奧林匹亞競賽學生的追蹤研究--環境影響之探討
- Parenting Styles, Family Dynamic System and Culture: Do They Influence Creativity?
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 性別、產業型態及創造經驗與創意相關的個人特質、家庭及學校因素之關係=The Relationships between Gender, Type of Industry, Experience in Creation and Personal Traits, Family, and School Factors that Pertaining to Creativity Development |
---|---|
作 者 | 葉玉珠; 吳靜吉; 鄭英耀; | 書刊名 | 國立政治大學學報 |
卷 期 | 82 2001.06[民90.06] |
頁 次 | 頁125-159 |
分類號 | 555.8 |
關鍵詞 | 科技與資訊; 家庭; 個人特質; 創造力; 學校; Creativity; Family; Personal traits; School; Technology and information; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究的主要目的為:(一)比較科技與資訊產業中男性與女性研究發人員在三個創意發展的相關因素(個人特質、家庭及學校)上的差異;(二)探討產業型態(科技與資訊)及創造經驗對這三個創意發展的相關因素之效果。本研究的參與者共計360位研發人員,其中162位服務於資訊界,198位服務於科技界。主要的研究發現為(一)女性較男性研發人員擁有較多有助於創意發展的個人特質以及家庭與學校經驗; (二)創造經驗為預測創意發展相關的個人特質之有效預測指標,但無法有效預測相關的家庭及學校因素; (三)產業型態對創意發展相關的個人特質、家庭及學校因素均無顯著的預測力;(四)良好的家庭及學校環境應有助於創造力的發展,但並不保證高創意的產生。 |
英文摘要 | The main purposes of this study were (a)to analyze the differences between male and female R&D personnel in technology and information industries on three correlates of creativity: personal traits, family, and school; and (b)to understand the interaction effects of type of industry and experience in creation on the three correlates of creativity development. Among the 360 R&D participants, 162 were working in information industries while 198 were working in technology industries. The employed instruments were The Inventory of Personal-trait Factors to Creativity Development (IPF-CD), The Inventory of Family Factors to Creativity Development (IFF-CD), The Inventory of School Factors to Creativity Development (ISF-CD), and several questions developed by the researchers. The findings revealed that (a) there were gender differences in personal traits as well as family and school experiences pertaining to creativity development; (b) experience in creation was an effective predictor for personal traits, but not for family and school factors pertaining to creativity development; (c) type of industry was not an effective predictor for all the three correlates of creativity development; and (d) a positive family and school environment may contribute to the development of creativity but would not necessarily bring about highly creative people. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。