查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 心情好,就覺得好事容易發生?--心情一致性主觀機率判斷的模式檢證=Models Verification of Mood Congruency Subjective Probability Judgment |
---|---|
作 者 | 王強之; 陳學志; | 書刊名 | 應用心理學報 |
卷 期 | 7 1999.03[民88.03] |
頁 次 | 頁17-39 |
分類號 | 171.3 |
關鍵詞 | 心情一致性主觀機率判斷; 語意聯結網路理論; 心情即訊息模式; 情感注入模式; 認知調整模式; Mood congruency subjective probability judgment; Semantic associative network model; Mood as information model; Affect infusion model; Cognitive tuning model; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文檢證四種「心情一致性主觀機率判斷」的理論模式。「意連結網路理論」主張,某種心情會自動化的激發與該心情有關的事件、概念、記憶。故而,不論能否正確歸因心情依源,正負向心情組對個人或非個人事件都會引發心情一致性判斷。「心情即訊息模式」則認為,若人們無法正確的覺知目前心情的引發來源,則會將當時的心情歸因至目標刺激上。故而只要受試者不能正確歸因心情來源,正負向心情組針對個人或非個人事件均會引發心情一致性判斷。「情感注入模式」認為,與個人有關的目標,會使用低情感注入的動機性調整策略,而使一致性的機率判斷消失。對個人無關的目標,在正向心情下,會使用類似心情即訊息模式的捷處理策略。而在負向心情下則會使用與語意網路類似的實質處理策略。故而,僅在錯誤歸因下,正向心情組對非個人事件才會產生心情一致性判所。「知調整模式」宣稱,正向心情暗示環境安全無虞,使個體傾向使用類似心情即訊息模式的簡化捷思策略;負向心情則表示環境充滿疑問,必須使用分析情境下,正向心情組的主觀機率判斷上。實驗一使用偽裝的「閱讀故事法」引發心情,以避免帀試者正確地歸因心情來源,發,只有正向心情組在判斷正向事件時產生心情一致性的機率判斷。實驗二使用「想像回憶法」引發心情,並讓受試者正確歸因心情來源,結果發現任何心情狀態及事件內容上均未觀察到心情一致性的主觀機率判斷兩個實驗的結果,完全符合「認知調整模式」對弱勢心情一致性主觀機率判斷論點的預測。 |
英文摘要 | This article verified four models of “Mood congruency subjective probability judgment”. First, “Semantic associative network model” assumed that special mood would activate related events, concepts and memory automatically. Therefore, regardless of whether subjects would attribute source of mood correctly or not, positive or negative mood groups would be expected to induce mood congruency subjective judgment in personal or non-personal related events. Second, “Mood as information model” claimed that if subject couldn’t aware sources of current mood, they would attribute mood to the target stimulus. In such condition, positive or negative mood groups would be expected to induce mood congruency subjective probability judgment in personal or non-personal related events. Third, “Affect infusion model” predicted that only in the condition of positive mood, misattribution, and non-personal related targets would produce mood congruency subjective probability judgment. Latest, “Cognitive tuning model” presumed that, positive mood implied safety, hence subjects used simplified heuristic strategy just like “Mood as information model” predicted. But negative mood implied danger, so subjects used analytical systematic processes. Therefore, mood congruency probability judgment only occurred in positive and misattribution condition. Experiment I used disguised story comprehension task to induce subjects’ mood, in orders to avoid subjects correct mood attribution. Result found only positive mood group judged positive events produced mood congruency probability judgment. Experiment II used imagery recall techniques to induce subjects’ mood, and instructed subjects attribute his mood to the correct source. In this experiment, no matter which mood status or events, no any mood congruency subjective probability judgment was observed. Combined two experiments’ data, perfectly accord the prediction of weak version “cognitive tuning model”. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。