查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- First, Second, and Third: An Epistemological Reflection on Comparative Methodology Through Reviewing Tim-hung Ku古添洪,Jihao Shixue記號詩學[Semiotics of Poetry] and Karl H. Kao高辛勇,Xingmingxue Yu Xushi Lilun形名學與敘事理論[Semiotics and Narratology]
- 理論是玄談?--評[高辛勇著]《形名學與敘事理論》
- 以語藝觀點解析公元2000年總統大選扁陣營之電視競選廣告
- 人物傳記體展示的文本分析與敘事策略--以「李約瑟與抗戰時中國的科學」紀念展為例
- 從林語堂到潘婷婷:中心與邊緣的文化敍事
- 為什麼是關鍵--從敘事理論解讀「蘋果樹」
- 符號世界中的詩學--評[古添洪著]《記號詩學》
- 記號詩學
- 敘事的與非敘事的--論夏宇詩中「情節式意象」作為敘事策略之呈現
- 當孩子與老師運作的課程相遇--幼兒經驗課程的個案研究
第1筆 /總和 1 筆
/ 1 筆
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | First, Second, and Third: An Epistemological Reflection on Comparative Methodology Through Reviewing Tim-hung Ku古添洪,Jihao Shixue記號詩學[Semiotics of Poetry] and Karl H. Kao高辛勇,Xingmingxue Yu Xushi Lilun形名學與敘事理論[Semiotics and Narratology] |
---|---|
作 者 | Lee,Hong-chung; | 書刊名 | Tamkang Review |
卷 期 | 28:3 民87.春 |
頁 次 | 頁133-150 |
分類號 | 811、811 |
關鍵詞 | 記號詩學; 形名學; 敘事理論; First/firstness; Second/secondness; Third/thirdness; Metaphor; Monism/monistic; Peirce; Kao; Ku; Icon; Mimesis; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | The aim of this review article is to reflect on the methodology of comparative literature through Charles Sanders Peirce's semiotic theory. The crucial and polemic point in both Ku's and Kao's books amounts to the relationships between Chinese literature and semiotic theories. Without speculating and defining their relations, the application of theories to the texts evades methodological or even epistemological aporia especially when theories and texts are conspicuously heterologous; both are what Peirce has called the First or monad which exists independently of others. In that sense, the violence of theories is manifest to a great extent. The problem is: what is to be saved, the text or object of analysis, or the analytical structure? Structuralism and semiotics seem to run into the dead end when the concept of "structure" or "system" becomes the target of criticism. But, the object can only be saved, not in itself, but in the Other/Other, in the immanent negativity of the theoretical Other: salvation never exists outside though it is impossible without the outside. Peirce's Philosophy leads to a way to "inscribe" this possibility of dyadic salvation through Secondness or indexical copulation or articulation. Comparison, articulation or copulation is what Peirce has termed by "Thirdness" which, however, cannot be achieved except by establishing the "Firstness." In the case of comparative literature, the separateness of the object from theories represents the condition of "Secondness." To explicate the transformation of the First by the Second in order to achieve the Third is what I endeavour to accomplish here. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。