頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 自我成長團體有效因素之探討=Group Psychotherapeutic Factors in a Self-Assertive Group |
---|---|
作 者 | 侯淑英; 張明永; 蘇以青; | 書刊名 | The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences |
卷 期 | 14:12 1998.12[民87.12] |
頁 次 | 頁770-778 |
分類號 | 178.4 |
關鍵詞 | 自我成長團體; 團體治療; Self-assertive group; Therapeutic factors; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 應用團體治療之原理與技巧於自我成長訓練為現代團體治療之新趨勢。本研究為 探討一自我成長團體之有效的相關因子,以期將來做治療性團體之參考。研究以一社區組成 的自我成長團體為對象,以 Yalom 之十二項有效因素,對所有參與者做評估。 研究對象含 所有團體成員共 13 名(男性 9 名,女性 4 名),其中包括一位高中畢業重考生,四位護 理人員及八位工業工廠之員工, 平均年齡在 35.2 ± 9.5 歲,40 歲以上成員佔 46.15%。 經統計分析後團體成員對有效因素之評價前三項依序為「認同」、「存在性因素」、及「人 際關係之學習 -- 吸收」。不同的年齡和性別在「認同」及「存在性因素」二項有效因素的 得分差異不大。此外,男性或年齡 40 歲以上者,在排序第三之有效因素均為「人際關係之 學習 -- 釋放」;女性或四十歲以下之成員認為「問題普遍性」之因素較「人際關係之學習 -- 吸收」的收獲為多。 此一成長團體出現之有效因素與文獻上報告以門診病人團體,或是 大學生成長團體為之研究略有不同,此差異可能是性別及年齡層之發展任務不同而有區別。 本文就此研究結果嘗試與其他治療性團體進行比較,以探討影響團體有效因子之種種因素。 |
英文摘要 | The technique of group psychotherapy has recently been introduced to the practice in self-assertiveness training group This study aims to assess various group factors that are hypothesized to be effective in the group process in a self-assertive group. Subjects of the study were participants in a 13-member self-assertiveness training group, with 4 female nurese and 8 male employees and 1 male student. The average age of this group was 35.2 years. Assessment of the group was based on Yalom's concept of twelve therapeutic factors in the group process. The results showed that 'identificantion', 'The existential factor' and 'interpersonal learning-input' were the three most important factors demonstrated during the group process. There were no significant age and gender differences in the above 'identification' and 'existential' factors. However, different beneficial factors were found for each group: for subjects aged 40 and above and males, it was 'interpersonal learning-output'; while in those with aged under 40 and females, 'universality' was more important than 'interpersonal learning-input'. Comparison of therapeutic factors among different groups was attempted. The above results were found different from patient groups, or the groups of university students. The discrepancy is due to different composition and tasks of each group. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。