查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從賴和到呂赫若:一桿「稱仔」與牛車之比較=From Lai He to Lu He Juo: The Comparison between a Shaft of "Cheng-Tsai" and the Bullock Cart |
---|---|
作 者 | 徐士賢; | 書刊名 | 世新大學學報 |
卷 期 | 8 1998.10[民87.10] |
頁 次 | 頁295-311 |
分類號 | 863 |
關鍵詞 | 臺灣文學; 文學影響; 賴和; 呂赫若; Taiwanese literature; Literary indebtedness; Lai He; Lu He-juo; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文嘗試解決以下問題:呂赫若的文學創作究竟有無受到其前輩作家賴和的影響;如果有,則證據何在?又這樣的傳承關係,對我們建立臺灣文學作家的系譜有何意義?為使討論免於空泛,作者將賴、呂二人的重要作品一桿「稱仔」與牛車做了極為深入的比較;並自文學作品的內在證據指出,這兩篇作品有太多不可能出於偶然的相似現象。因而證實了呂赫若的確是受到賴和一桿「稱仔」的極大影響而創作了牛車。本文進而指出就思想內涵而言,我們也該承認呂赫若是賴和式左翼文學在三0年代的繼起者。論文分為五節:一、前言;二、細讀賴和一桿「稱仔」;三、細讀呂赫若牛車;四、比較一桿「稱仔」與牛車;五、結論。 |
英文摘要 | This dissertation attempts to answer the following questions: Are the literary works of Lu He-juo affected by his senior writer, Lai He in any respect? If yes, what are the proofs or evidence? Besides, what can this link between generations mean in the formation of the pedigree of authors in Taiwanese Literature? The author has made a profound comparison between A Shaft of "Cheng-Tsai" and The Bullock Cart-the important works written by Lai He and Lu He-juo respectively-so that the discussions will not be vague and general. The evidence found in the literary works themselves indicates that between both writings there are many similarities that cannot occur just out of coincidence, which proves that Lu He-juo had indeed had great literary indebtedness to Lai He and his work, A Shaft of "Cheng-Tsai," in his writing of The Bullock Cart, and which further indicates that in terms of the connotation of thought, it has to be admitted that Lu He-juo was the successor of the left wing literary of Lai He in the 1930's. The Dissertation is written in five parts: Ⅰ. Preface Ⅱ. Careful and detailed study of A Shaft of "Cheng-Tsai" written by Lai He Ⅲ. Careful and detailed study of The Bullock Cart written by Lu He-juo Ⅳ. Comparison Between A Shaft of "Cheng-Tsai" and The Bullock Cart Ⅴ. Conclusion |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。