查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 春秋三傳論軍禮異同辨三事=On the Different Comments of Three Events in Chung-Chio |
---|---|
作 者 | 徐麗霞; | 書刊名 | 實踐學報 |
卷 期 | 29 1998.06[民87.06] |
頁 次 | 頁331-348 |
分類號 | 095 |
關鍵詞 | 春秋三傳; 軍禮異同辨三事; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 孔子作<<春秋>>,微言大義,一字褒貶,故三傳雖多相同,亦頗生齟齬,本文於 吉、凶、軍、賓、嘉五禮,取軍禮三條,首標經文,次例三家釋例,後引證各家說法,藉以 比較三傳異同,並粗陳鄙見,略定去取。三事為;(1) 「成公元年,三月,作丘甲。」此條 乃魯成公為齊大難將至,改變軍賦以增戰力,至於改變額數眾說紛紜,本文歸納常說三種, 參佐史實,以為「一丘出一乘,增四倍」者為近是。(2) 「襄公十一年,春王正月,作三軍 。」穀梁氏日:「古者天子六師,諸侯一軍,作三軍,非正也。」最不切實,案諸書所載周 制:天子六軍,諸侯:大國三軍、次國二軍、小國一軍;天才非六師,諸侯非盡一軍也。公 羊之意,魯二軍之國,但有上卿、下卿:司空、司徒實掌軍權,司馬號總監,形同虛設;作 三軍者,益中軍,予司馬權力。杜注左氏謂魯無中軍,唯上下二軍,三卿更帥,今假立中軍 以改制度。然魯究竟次國、大國﹖前賢每興聚訟,本文引析諸說,要結之:三家廢毀公室軍 ,各得其一,私用之也。(3) 「昭公八年,秋,蒐于紅。」公羊以為因罕而書,譏之也。穀 梁則謂是禮之正,美之也。左氏言「大蒐于紅」「革車千乘」,彰魯公在蒐中,但政握三家 ,大失其權,不主其事耳。本文反覆分辯三家主張,用發強臣專權之史實也。 |
英文摘要 | Confucius wrote Chung-Chio to explain or comment the important events in his contemporary. Three of the famous scholars, Tsuo-shih, Kung-yang, Ku-liang, made footnotes for Chung-Chio, hoping people understand the history of Dukedom Lu. In the paper, I quote the three events and the footnotes first, and review different results of many researches. By making contrast and comparison, it comes to my conclusion. Three events are:(1)Duke Cheng developed Chio's army. Being afraid of Chi's attack, Duke Cheng recruited army and increased tax to reinforce the defensive ability. What the recruitment increased was various. In my opinion, it should be quadruplicate. (2)Three of Duke Hsiang's courts deprived him of his military. In this wartime, no courts respected the Emperor or the Duke. In fact, they tried their best to obtain the power and authority. After reviewing different literatures, I think the truth is: the three powerful courts deprived Duke Hsiang of his army for personal ambition. (3)The three courts held military parade in So. To sum up, the purpose of this research is to emphasize the history of the powerful court neglect to the Duke. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。