查詢結果分析
相關文獻
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 民主制與民族主義:一個修正自由主義的觀點=Democracy and Nationalism: A Viewpoint in Revised Liberalism |
---|---|
作 者 | 莊明哲; | 書刊名 | 中山人文社會科學期刊 |
卷 期 | 7:2=17 1999.12[民88.12] |
頁 次 | 頁33-57 |
分類號 | 571.11 |
關鍵詞 | 民族; 民主; 民族主義; 民族認同; 民族性; 交疊共識; Nation; Democracy; Nationalism; National identity; Nationhood; Nationality; Overlapping consensus; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 民主在過去常被視為是一個貶抑詞。在亞理斯多德的定義中,它還是多數暴力的 代名詞。但是,隨著歷史的發展,民主一詞已得到了重新評估的機會。而民族主義呢? 最近幾年來,一種平反或提議重新認識它的發音似乎正逐漸的與起。 (Nodia, 1994: Tamir, 1995; Miller,1995: Canovan, 1996; Guibemnau, 1996) 這些學者嘗試表達一種訊 息:有沒有一種可能,民族主義就像民主一般,在日後得到一個較為公允的對待? 或者,將 民主與民族主義兩者併同起來考察,他們之間的關係存在著怎樣的可能? 本文將通過這樣的理論,評估自由派學者所可能忽略的若干觀點,特別是關於「民族性 的相關預設與羅爾斯 (JohnRawls) 「交疊共識」的概念。 通過歸納的了解,筆者將指出: 1. 民族認同不僅是一個抽象的空泛之詞,而是具有歷史承載重量的存在標的; 2. 民族認同並不會導致個人自主性的受到抹煞, 民族主義典自由主義之間仍存在著共容的 空間; 3. 從自由主義以及社群主義兩者的折衷出發所發展的市民社會以及由市民社會所架構起來 的民主體制, 有可能削弱激進的民族主義者的動員能量,從而使民族國家中的不同族群 與族群文化得到較為公平的發展機會。 |
英文摘要 | Democracy used to be regarded as a derogatory term in the past; it was a synonym of Majority Tyranny in Aristotle's definition. Throughout centuries of development in meaning, the term has obtained its proper status. But, how about Nationalism? Some opponents' claims have emerged recently, although, many liberals have been considering nationalism to be antidemocratic as it may lead to xenophobia, ethnic conflicts and wars. These opponents hold the view that the negative aspects are not the products of nationalism itself, in fact, nationalism is a necessary ingredient for democracy; one cannot exist without the other, or at least, they are compatible to each other. This point of view provides a need to re-evaluate nationalism and further looks into the relationship between nationalism and democracy. Based on the previous statement, this paper will examine certain points raised by liberals, especially the concept of "Overlapping Consensus" by John Rawls and the presumptions about 'nationality' or 'nationhood'. With inductive and comparative methods, I will show that: 1. The national identity is not a term with vacuity, but a substantial entity carrying a historical load with its commitments; 2. The national identity will not cause a limitation in individual autonomy. Nevertheless, there exists possibilities for compatibility between liberalism and communitarianism; 3. The democratic institution founded by a civil society, which is a compromise of liberalism and communitarianism, may reduce the power of nationalist movement, eventually the various ethnic groups and their cultures in a nation-state will be treated more equally. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。