查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 不同居住型態學生健康促進行為之差異
- 消化性潰瘍首次住院病人住院前健康促進行為的探討
- 社區老年人健康促進行為及其相關因素的探討--以高雄市三民區老人為例
- 一位家庭照顧者之健康促進行為
- The Comparison of the Health Promotion Behavior among Nurses, Physicians, and the Publics
- 結核病患同住青少年對結核病知識、態度及健康促進行為之探討
- Considering the Factors of Gender and Body Weight in the Promotion of Healthy Behavior among Adolescents
- 追蹤資料探討老年人居住安排及型態變遷之研究
- 醫院健康促進行為與挖掘自費健康檢查顧客之分析
- A Preliminary Survey of the Health Behaviors of Community Leaders
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 不同居住型態學生健康促進行為之差異=The Health Promotion Lifestyle of Students between Living Home and Living Outsides |
---|---|
作 者 | 張彩秀; | 書刊名 | 弘光學報 |
卷 期 | 32 1998.10[民87.10] |
頁 次 | 頁47-64 |
分類號 | 419.71 |
關鍵詞 | 健康促進行為; 居住型態; Health promotion lifestyle; Living status; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 人出生於家庭,許多的生活習慣於此養成但各個種因素,學生需面臨離開家庭到外面居住,其行為也可能因此而改變。故本研究欲探討不同的居住型態在健康促進行為方面之差異。 經由問卷調查的方式,收集894名新生健康促進的生活方式(內容包括:自我實現、健康責任、人際支持、運動、壓力處置及營養),問卷採陳氏問卷量表,本研究經過前測後Chronbach Alpha值介於0.88-0.89,顯示問卷的可信性,將回收資料以SAS/PC進行描述性及分析性(卡方檢定、T 檢定及迴歸分析)。結果發現:有55.3%的同學住外面。學生健康促進行為依分數高低之先後順序為:人際支持表現最好其次依序為:營養、壓力處理、自我實現、健康責任及運動行為。影響學生整體健康促進行為之人口學變項為:科別、主觀健康感受及居住情形。而不同居住狀況學生在『運動行為』及『營養行為』方面出現明顯差異:即住家裡在運動行為及營行為之表現上優於住外面的同學。常期望以本研究為依據優先排定住校學生之營養促進行為,強調注重三餐之質與量,並於校內多推展運動。 |
英文摘要 | Our lifestyle is formed from family, Some students must leave their home to live outsides for studying, they may change their lifestyle. our research is to investigate livinghome and outside students'health promotion lifestyle. We collect 894 samples by modified health promotion lifestyle profile. The chronbach alpha of this questionnaire is 0.88-0.89. We uses SAS/PC for data analysis. The results show: there are 55.3% students living outsides. The priority of their health promotion lifestyle are : interpersonal support, nutrition, stress management, self actualization, health responsibility, and exercise. The factors affect health promotion lifestyle are : department, perception of health and living form. We also find there are two factors (nutrition, exercise behavior )significant difference between living home and living outsides. Both of the two behavior, students living home are better than living outsides. We expect we can according the results to promote students living outsides will notice the quantity and quality of diet and promote exercise behavior in school. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。