查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Comparison of Nasal Trauma Associated with Nasopharyngeal Airway Applied by Nurses and Experienced Anesthesiologists
- 南部某醫專護理科在校生護士執照考與校外補習關係性之初步探討
- Stress Coping Strategy and Psychological Well-Being of Nurses: The Singapore Experience
- Advances in Cardiac Resuscitation
- Anticipating Changes of Resuscitation in American Heart Association Guidelines
- External Chest Compression, Standard and Newer Alternate Techniques
- Role of Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Safety and Efficacy of Primary Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by prolonged Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- 臺灣地區男性護理人力之供給與分佈之調查研究
- 護理人員面對病患性騷擾及因應之初探
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Comparison of Nasal Trauma Associated with Nasopharyngeal Airway Applied by Nurses and Experienced Anesthesiologists=比較護士及麻醉醫師置放鼻咽氣道引致的鼻部傷害 |
---|---|
作 者 | 鍾志豪; 沈青華; 李漢倫; 鄭嘉遜; 譚培炯; | 書刊名 | 長庚醫學 |
卷 期 | 22:4 1999.12[民88.12] |
頁 次 | 頁593-597 |
分類號 | 416.879 |
關鍵詞 | 鼻咽氣道; 鼻傷害; 護士; 心肺復甦術; Nasopharyngeal airway; Nasal trauma; Nurse; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 背景:護士置放鼻咽氣道被認為具侵入性。本研究比較受過訓練的護士與麻醉醫 師置放非咽氣道引致的鼻部傷害之發生率及嚴重程度,以確認受過訓練的護士置放鼻咽氣道 的安全性。 方法:研究對象包括接受全身麻醉的116名男性及96名女性患者,男、女性各隨機平均分成 2組(Ms及Md,Fs及Fd)。以靜脈注射2.5%sodium thiopental及fentanyl引導麻醉。開刀 房護士及資深麻醉醫師分組對研究對象以bag-valve-mask作換氣。對換氣不成功的患者放置 鼻咽氣道並再予換氣,換氣後以肉眼檢視鼻孔及以喉頭鏡檢視咽喉以確定出血部位及傷害分 級。比較由護士及麻醉醫師放置鼻咽氣道引致鼻部受傷的發生率及受傷程度。 結果:顯示受過訓練的護士置放鼻咽氣管不會比麻醉醫師引致更嚴重的鼻部傷害。 結論:吾人建議在CPR時,護士應可在需要情況下,對臉部無異常的病患置放鼻咽氣管。 |
英文摘要 | Background: Insertion of a nasopharyngeal airway by nurses is considered to be invasive. We compared the incidence and severity of nasal injury associated with nasopharyngeal airway insertion by trained nurses to those by anesthesiologists to determine the safety of inserting a nasopharyngeal airway by nurses in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods: One hundred and sixteen male and 96 female patients scheduled for general anesthesia were included in the study. The male and female patients were randomly assigned to two groups respectively. Anesthesia was induced with sodium thiopental and fentanyl intravenously. The patients were then ventilated with a bag-valve-mask by trained nurses or anesthesiologists. In the unsuccessfully ventilated patients, nasopharyngeal airways were inserted to facilitate subsequent ventilation. The nasopharyngeal airway, oropharynx, and nostrils were then examined. The incidence and severity of nasal trauma induced by trained nurses or by anesthesiologists were compared. Results: The study revealed that nasopharyngeal airways applied by trained nurses did not induce more severe nasal trauma than those by anesthesiologists. Conclusion:We suggest that nasopharyngeal airways may be applied safely by trained nurses in CPR. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。