查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- The Circle of Textualization
- 先秦名家對概念之分析
- Collaborating Reading with Writing: A Case Study of Critique-Writing
- The Characteristics of Newspaper English and Application to English Teaching: An Analysis Based on the Texts of Four English-language Newspapers
- Linking L2/FL Reading and Writing
- A Homepage-based Problem Solving Project
- The Use of Think-aloud Protocols in Investigation of Second Language Reading
- 閱讀與寫作整合的教與學
- 閱讀與寫作整合的寫作歷程模式之適配度研究
- 海明威的閱讀與寫作--我看[海明威著,成寒譯]《流動的饗宴》
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | The Circle of Textualization=試論「文化圈」 |
---|---|
作 者 | 董崇選; | 書刊名 | 國立中興大學臺中夜間部學報 |
卷 期 | 3 1997.11[民86.11] |
頁 次 | 頁145-181 |
分類號 | 810 |
關鍵詞 | 文化圈; 詮釋圈; 閱讀; 寫作; 內涵; 外延; 內文; 外文; The circle of textualization; The hermeneutical circle; Reading; Writing; Intention; Extention; Internal text; External text; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本文試圖建立「文化圈」為詮釋文學的基本概念。 全文先論及西方所謂「詮釋圈 」的問題,接著認定經驗人生便是在詮釋人生;詮釋即覺知加上反應,亦即產生「內文」的 「閱讀」加上產生「外文」的「寫作」。而人類一生都在「閱讀」人生與「寫作」人生:閱 讀為詮釋之始,寫作為詮釋之終,兩者構成一詮釋圈。但此詮釋圈也是一種「文化圈」,因 為閱讀是將外物「內文」化,寫作則則將內心「外文」化。有了這種「文化圈」的觀念之後 ,便知所有的文本 -- 包括作家的、評批家的、翻譯家的、編輯者的、及至出版商的 -- 都 是一樣地有創造性、批評性、翻譯性、編輯性、詮釋性等。其實,如果再運用「內涵」與「 外延」的觀念來探討,我們便可以進一步知道:在閱讀與寫作不斷循環的「文化圈」�堙A文 本的意義確實存在著不確定性。從現代各種「閱讀的二分法」中,我們更能了解到:詮釋的 謬誤是無可避免的。本文最後用兩個圖表來說明閱讀與寫作所形成的「詮釋圈」或「文化圈 」,有牽涉到那些產生詮釋困難的因素。 |
英文摘要 | This paper tries to establish the idea of "the circle of textualization" as an essential idea for literary interpretation. It first touches on the problem of "the hermeneutical circle." It then suggests that to experience is to interpret; to interpret is to perceive and react, or simply to "read" and "write." Reading (the internalization of external tests) and writing (the externalization of internal texts) form a perpetual circle of textualization which human beings never cease to engage in. Foucault's distinction between the fundamental, creative discourse and the derivative, commentary discourse is criticized. This paper argues that the writer's text, the critic's, the reviewer's, the translator's, the editor's, the printer's, the publisher's, or indeed everyone's text is at once creative, critical, commentary, translative, editorial, evaluative, and interpretative. What we call intertextuality is in fact a very complicated network of textualization. The philosophical ideas of "intention" vs. "extention" are used to explain the acts of reading and writing and to discuss the issues of textual meaning and textual indeterminacy. In the discussion, many modern scholars' dichotomies of reading are mentioned. Finally, this paper uses two figures to show the various factors involved in the circle of textualization and concludes that as man cannot avoid interpretative fallacies, the circle of textualization is a circle of textualization is a circle of indeterminate reading and writing of texts both correctly and incorrectly all the time. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。