查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 建構科學知識的理論性爭議之省思與再出發=Reflexion on the Theoretical Dispute of the Construction of Scientific Knowledge and its Alternative |
---|---|
作者 | 陳秉璋; | 書刊名 | 東吳社會學報 |
卷期 | 4 1995.03[民84.03] |
頁次 | 頁115-163 |
分類號 | 501 |
關鍵詞 | 本質主義的預設; 現象主義的不可妥協性; 辯證邏輯; 邏輯經驗主義; 變項敏感度; Essentialistic assumption; Le phenomenisme intransigeant; Speculative logic; Empirisme logique; Sensibility of varables; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本篇論文的主要結構內涵及其目的,包括下列三大部分;其一;按照不同的主題爭議,有系統地整理各家與各派的不同理論性論述;其二;簡介差異性論述之後,分別指出各種觀點的特性與優劣點,尤其是『懸而未決的困境與問題』。其三;綜合西方各家各派的不同理論性論述,以及所遺留下來的問題我們再從社會科學的思維立場與角度,提出『新質疑面向』;西方社會學是否因為深受傳統形而上學認知論的過份影響與作用,因而遲遲無法建構其獨特的科學知識體系?我們的回答是肯定的。職是之故,我們才企圖提出;東方社會學的認知論與方法論,藉以解決這些懸而未解決的問題,進而為社會學建構出乙套完整的獨特科學知識。 |
英文摘要 | This article contains three essential parts, and each part is destined to a different goal: Part1: According to the most important Issue and problem, We try to make a very brief review and introduction, concerning the different kind of views and arguments presented by each School. Part2: following the introduction and presentation, some comments and critiques would be made, trying to point out their characteristic, particularity, weakness, and especially the "problematiques." Part 3: Basing on the theoretical disputes, we get a new aspect of problematique as follow: Due to the influence of the traditional- metaphysical theory of Cognitive, the western Sociology is, until today, unable to establish it's own specific knowledge system? Our answer is positive. In order to dissolve this problem we have intention to present a new theory of Sociological Cognitive. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。