頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 中共「刑法」本質及其基本原則之研究 |
---|---|
作 者 | 李維宗; | 書刊名 | 國防管理學院學報 |
卷 期 | 16:1 1995.01[民84.01] |
頁 次 | 頁69-85 |
分類號 | 587.92 |
關鍵詞 | 刑法; 立法; 本質; 階級性; 工具性; 政治性; 矛盾性; 罪刑法定原則; 罪刑明確原則; 不溯既往原則; 禁止類推原則; Criminal law; Enact ment; Nature; Class; Tool; Policy; Controdiction; The principle of a prescribed punishment for a specified crime; The principle of defining a crime and its penalty; The principle of non-retroactivity; The principle of forbidden analogy; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 中共於統治大陸三十年後始制定了《刑法》,即使合乎立法的形式,但 本質卻與民主國家迥然不同。筆者分就階級性、工具性、政治性、矛盾性等思想 探討中共(刑法)的本質。同時,本文亦就中共爭論最大的"罪刑法定"原則,及其 衍生出的原則,如罪刑明確原則、不溯既往原則、禁止類推原則,分別評述之。 |
英文摘要 | The Chinese Communists did not enact the Criminal Law until they had ruled the Mainlandfor thirty years. Though this enactment seems quite legalized in terms of form, yet the nature ofthe Criminal Law enacted by the People's Republic of China is considerably different from that ofthe democratic countries'. As a result, this writer makes a careful study of the nature of the PROC'sCriminal Law in terms of class, tool, policy and controdiction separately. Meanwhile, this paper also states first and then criticizes the most controversial issues of thePROC's Criminal Law: "the Principle of a Prescribed Punishment for a Specified Crime", and itsdeveloping principles. For example, "the Principle of Defining a Crime and its Penalty", "the Principle of Non-retroactivity", and "the Principle of Forbidden Analogy" are individually mentioned andcommented on. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。