頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 美國聯邦政府待遇調整制度化之研究 |
---|---|
作 者 | 林文燦; | 書刊名 | 空大行政學報 |
卷 期 | 2 1994.12[民83.12] |
頁 次 | 頁125-158 |
分類號 | 574.5243 |
關鍵詞 | 給與; 待遇; 公平; 比較原則; Compensation; Pay; Equity; Comparability principle; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 公務人員年度待遇調整案是政府每年重要的一項決策,待遇水準高低攸關政府可否成功延攬、留用及激勵優秀人才的重要決定因素。如果公共部門待遇水準不具有競爭性,則政府無法吸引、留用及激勵優秀人員,以落實政務之推動。美國自1962年聯邦待遇改革法、1970年聯邦待遇改革法及1990年聯邦公務人員待遇比較法以來,建立多項原則,藉以使聯邦公務人員待遇水準能與私人企業在勞動市場上,一較短長;保障公務人員待遇方面權益,以避免政客不當干擾。其重要原則如次:一.修正比較原則,聯邦公務人員待遇水準在某地區內與辦理相同工作的非聯邦公務人員待遇標準,一較長短。二.建立通案年度待遇調整幅度以雇用成本指數為基礎之原則,1994年起實施地域薪給制度。三.規範總統在公務人員待遇調整方面之權限,總統只有在國家處於戰爭狀態(由國會宣布)及遭受屈重經濟情勢致影響到社會一般福利水準時,才有權修改前一原則所決定之待遇調整幅度。從理論言,組織通常考量下列五種指標,做為決定年度待遇調整幅度的決定因素:物價水準;生產力;獲利能力;勞動市場供需狀況及其他組織待遇水準等,而美國聯邦政府經審慎研討後,以雇用成本指數變動情形做為調整年度聯邦政府公務人員待遇幅度的決定指標。最值得一提的是,此一作法隱含著美國政府以制度化的方法,保障公務人員待遇方面權益,免於政客不當干涉之努力。總之,美國聯邦政府公務人員待遇調整制度化之作法,是最值得我國學習之處,亦是本研究之焦點所在。 |
英文摘要 | Annual pay adjustment is one of the most important decisions for government. The pay level will be a critical determinant of the government's success in recruiting, retaining, and motivating employees. If public sector pay level is not competitive, the government will be unable to attract, retain, and motivate best people to carryout the nation's missions. In U.S.A., the Federal Salary Reform Act of 1962, the Federal Salary ReformAct of 1970, as refined by the Federal Employees Pay Comparability Act of 1990, established some principles that federal employees could be competitive with privatesector in labour market, and could protect federal employees' pay rights from politician in appropriate intervention. Among these are the following: (1) To refine comparability principle, federal pay rates must be comparable with non-federal pay rates for the same levels of work within the same local pay area.(2) To establish general (annual) pay adjustments principles based on the Employment Cost Index (ECI) and by beginning a locality pay system on 1994. (3) To regulate the president's pay adjustment discretion power, president would have discretion to alter above pay adjustments rates because of national emergency War declared by Congress) or serious economic conditions affecting the general welfare. In theory, five criteria are usually used by making pay adjustments: pricetrends, productivity trends, profitability, labour market condition, and other employees' pay levels, but the U.S. federal government choices ECI as the determinant of annual pay adjustment. It is the implication that federal government establishs institutionalized method to protect employees from politicianinappropriate intervention. In sum, we deserve to learn the institutionalization of U.S.federal employees pay adjustment. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。