查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 核能電廠設立程序之司法審查--以德國法為中心 |
---|---|
作者 | 陳春生; | 書刊名 | 中山學術論叢 |
卷期 | 12 1994.06[民83.06] |
頁次 | 頁169-211 |
分類號 | 449.7 |
關鍵詞 | 判斷餘地; 計畫決定; 預測決定; 危險防止; 風險預防; 殘餘風險; 風險評價; 行政保留; 實踐理性標準; 參與之鑑定人; 鑑定人訴訟; 規範具體化之行政規則; 規範解釋之行政規則; 形成自由; 衡量脫落; 衡量不足; 衡量不成比例; 蓋然性程度; 審查密度; 本質性理論; 重要性理論; 動的基本權保護; Beurteilungsspielraum; Planungsentscheidung; Prognoseentscheidung; Gefahrenabwehr; Risikovorsorge; Restrisiko; Risisobewertung; Verwaltungsvorbehalt; Standard der Praktischen Verhunft; Antizipiertes Sachverstandigengutachten; Sachverstandigerprozess; Normkonkretisierende Verwaltungsvorschriften; Gestaltungsfreiheit; Abwagungoausfall Abwagungsdefizit; Abwagungsdisproportionalitat; Wahrscheinlich Keitsgrad; Kontrolldichte; Wesentlichkeitstheorie dynamischeo Grundrechtsschutz; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文探討德國原子能法許可程序中之司法審查問題。分從憲法層面及法律層面分 析,亦即從權力分立原則、基本權利保護、專家鑑定問題及從原子能法第七條第二項第三號 規定之構造,再由行政決定之計畫性與預測性分析。 另外討論德國實務上對此問題先後態度轉變之關鍵判決即聯行政法院一九八五年十二月十九日 之Wyhl判決。 本文之結論建議在原子能法領域司法對行政之審查,不能因行政之固有責任、或決定之專門 技術性或計畫性、預測性等而立即推演出法院須迴避審查。 專門技術性問題法院應可克服,而從人民基本權利保護角度,法院除程序審查外仍不能完全 放棄實體審查。 |
英文摘要 | Protecting the public against emissions of radiation from nuclear power plants requires careful selection of plant sites and proper design, construction and operation of the plants themselves. The legal basis for regulation of these activities in Germany is the Atomic Emergy Act (Atomgesetz) of 1959. Apart from the political process, the best check on agency action is founc in the courts. It is important to appreciate the circumstances under which courts will intervene in agency's decisionmaking in the Licensing Process in this field. One may say that courts will generally follow the agency's interpretation of statute (namely Atomic Energy Act §7) unless they are convinced that the interpretation is unreasonable. In other words, there is the presumption that the agency's view is correct. These reasons are as follows. First, in a highly technical area, the agency has had more experience than any particular judge in applying the Atomic Energy Act §7. Second, Congress has given the agency, rather then the court, primary responsibility for carrying out the law. Third, because of the plan and forecast's character of agency's decisionmaking, the administrative action ought to be held to be unreviewable. In this thesis we analyzed the issue in Germany of control of the licensing process of nuclear power plants which is made by administrative agency from view- points of constitutional and Statute's level. That is from protection of fundamental human rights in constitution, the principle of separation of power, the plan and forecast character of agency's decisionmaking. To conclude we suggest that courts must intervene in agency's decisionmaking in the process of Nuclear power plants both for procedural and factual issues. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。