查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 臺灣合作組織民主管理的限制性與未來性=The Limitation and the Future of Democratic Management in Taiwan's Co-ops Liang Ling-Ching |
---|---|
作 者 | 梁玲菁; | 書刊名 | 合作經濟 |
卷 期 | 64 2000.03[民89.03] |
頁 次 | 頁26-42 |
分類號 | 559.3 |
關鍵詞 | 臺灣; 合作組織; 民主管理; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 根據賴羅博士的觀察,由於存在一些因素致使民生管理不易落實於合作社。 而歐洲的消費、農業、住宅等合作社因社員人數規模較大,亦引發生一些管理上的問題。合作組織面對這種缺乏參與、無法落實民主管理、以及管理的難題,應如何改善管理結構是一項值得探討的議題。有關民主管理原則的實施,是否維持一人一票的管理,還是要因應現實需求而加以修正;在學理上有哪些觀點支持;現實社會中,是否已有合作組織採行其他的作法,來修正民主管理,這些看法和作法,對臺灣的合作組織在歷經許多政治、經濟變化之後有哪些啟示?這些均為本文的研究內容。 |
英文摘要 | Basing on the observation of Dr. Laidlaw(1980), there are some elements make uneasy to perform the principle of democratic management within the cooperative. Also, there are some over-size problem and management problems with the consumers' co-ops, agriculture co-ops, and housing co-ops in Europe, such as involuntary participating, financial scandals, etc. Then, how to increase the strength of member's participation and to improve the structure of management is worthy discussing further. Is it necessary to revise the principle of one-member-one-vote? If it is necessary, what's the theoretical view to support the revision? In reality, is there any cooperative that takes another way to perform the principle? From those views and ways, could they provide the experience for Taiwan cooperatives, especially after the political & economic changes in two decades? All the above questions are discussed in this paper. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。