頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國中聽障學生福利需求之研究--以臺北市、縣為例 |
---|---|
作 者 | 王麗美; 張蓓莉; | 書刊名 | 特殊教育研究學刊 |
卷 期 | 10 1994.06[民83.06] |
頁 次 | 頁229-256 |
分類號 | 548.2 |
關鍵詞 | 國中聽障學生; 福利需求; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究主要目的在探討國中聽障學生的福利需求,及影響福利需求的相關因素,並進一步瞭解國中聽障學生對當前政府所提供的福利措施之認知、運用及滿意度,再分析政府供給學生需求之情形。使用之工具為自編「國中聽障學生福利需求調查問卷」、「國中聽障學生溝通能力調查問卷」、「國中聽障學生親子溝通及教養情形調查問卷」等三種,針對臺北市四所設有啟聰資源班之學校及臺北市立啟聰學校除聽障外,無其他顯著障礙之學生,進行小團體施測,共計取得有效樣本數為178名。研究發現如下: 1.有80%以上的國中聽障學生,無論在經濟、就業(指需就業者)或社會性等需求上,均有其需求性。 2.不同溝通能力的國中聽障學生,在社會性需求上有顯著的差異,且高溝通能力組之需求高於中溝通能力組。 3.不同年級的國中聽障學生,在經濟需求上有顯著的差異,且二年級學生經濟需求較一年級高。 4.不同性別的國中聽障學生,在就業需求、福利需求總分上,皆達顯著差異,且男生在就業及福利需求總分上均高於女生。 5.不同社經地位的國中聽障學生,在經濟需求上有顯著差異,且低社經地位之學生,經濟需求高於中、高社經地位之學生。 6.不同的親子溝通及教養情形之國中聽障學生,在經濟需求上達顯著差異,「欠佳組」較「良好組」有高的經濟需求。 7.啟聰資源班與啟聰學校的學生,在福利需求各變項上均未達顯著性差異。 8.學生的溝通能力,與其就業需求、社會性需求有顯著的相關,亦即溝通能力愈好,就業需求愈低,社會性需求愈高,而與經濟需求、總福利需求無顯著的相關。 9.學生的社經地位與其經濟需求有顯著負相關,亦即社經地位愈高,經濟需求愈低。而就業需求、社會性需求及總福利需求與社經地位無顯著相關。 10.學生的親子溝通及教養情形與其經濟需求亦有顯著負相關,表示親子溝通及教養情形愈佳,則經濟需求愈低。 11.無論臺北市國中聽障學生或其父母,對當前政府所提供的福利措施,除「全額補助購買助聽器」、「免費或優待搭乘交通工具」、「全免或減免學雜費」等三項外,其餘項目知道者皆不及50%,而臺北縣國中聽障學生或其父母,對當前政府所提供的福利措施,除「免費或優待搭乘交通工具」一項外,其餘項目皆不及60%左右的人知道,也因此影響到使用率,更難談到滿意度問題。 12.臺北市國中聽障學生福利需求,與政府當前福利措施之供需,除經濟需求差距甚少外,就業需求、社會性需求二方面有差距;臺北縣國中聽陣學生福利需求,與政府當前福利措施之供需,在經濟、就業、社會性等需求上有差距。本研究依據上述之研究發現,進行討論並提出建議。 |
英文摘要 | This study was designed to investigate 178 juvenile hearing-impaired stduents' welfare needs, and related factors which had effects on their needs. The subjects were from resource rooms in the junior high schools and Taipei Municipal School for the Deaf, junior high level. Three questionnaires designed by authors were used to collected data for this study. The main results were as follows: 1. More than 80% of juvenile hearing-impaired students demonstrated that they had economic, vocation, and social needs. 2. There was significant difference in social needs between those were with different communication ability. The high ability group had more needs than that of the average group. 3. There was significant difference in economic needs between students at different grades. Grade II group demonstrated more needs than that of Grade I group. 4. There was significant difference in employment need and welfare needs between males and females. Male students demonstrated more needs than that of females. 5. There was significant difference in economic need between students of various SES. Low SES students demonstrated more needs than that of middle and high SES. 6. There was significant difference in economic need between students of various parent- child communication and parenting. Not good group demonstrated more needs than that of good group. 7. There was no significant difference in welfare needs between students from resource rooms and school for the deaf. 8. There were significant relationships between employment, social needs and students' communication ability. 9. There were significant negative relationships between economic needs and students' SES. There were no significant relationships between employment, social, as well as welfare needs and students' SES. 10. There were significant negative relationships between economic needs and parent- child communication as well as parenting. 11. The Students' and their parents were not familiar with all the welfare services offered by government. 12. There were significant differences between students' welfare needs and the welfare services offered by government. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。