查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 頸部關節活動度測量之效果與信度
- A Lumbar Motion Study of Spondylitis Patients
- Comparison of Ranges of Cervical Motion Measured by Gravity-Based Goniometry and Ultrasound-Based Motion Analysis System
- Intra-Rater Reliability of Measurement of Cervical Range of Motion Using an Ultrasound-Based Motion Analysis System
- 胸腔活動度的皮尺測量法
- 提升居家護理師執行個案關節活動度測量完整性
- Effects of Acute Brainstem Compression on Auditory Brainstem Response in the Guinea Pig
- Additional Ultrasound Therapy after Myofacial Trigger Point Injection for the Management of Postinjection Soreness
- Evaluating the Sensation of Nasal Obstruction with Acoustic Rhinometry and Rhinomanometry
- 動態衛星測量整數模稜約制法之研究
第1筆 /總和 1 筆
/ 1 筆
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 頸部關節活動度測量之效果與信度 |
---|---|
作 者 | 高木榮; 廖文炫; 陳昭瑩; 賴佳利; 連倚南; | 書刊名 | 中華民國物理治療學會雜誌 |
卷期 | 18:2 1993.09[民82.09] |
頁次 | 頁191-195 |
分類號 | 418.92 |
關鍵詞 | 活動度; 測量; 頸部關節; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 關節活動度(Range of Motion,以下簡稱ROM)之測量為醫療專業人員評 估病人時常用的基本手法。本研究的目的在比較不同測量工具對頸部關節活動度 測量之效度及信度。方法為選用30位曾經受過關節活動度測量之講習者為測試 者。其中7位為目前正接受物理治療實習的大學四年級學生,23位物理治療學系 大學三年級學生。利用三種不同測量工具,測量一位正常受測者之頸椎伸展及屈 曲之ROM。三種不同測量工具為1.標準圓規雙臂式(Universal Goniometer,OG GIKEN Co.)2.電子數位式(Electronic Digital Inclinometer,Cybex ED1320)及3.液體擺 錘式(Uni-level Inclinometer,ISOMEED)。受測者採坐姿。標準圓規雙臂式之測法依 據諾今(Norkin)之著書所述,軸心對準外耳道,固定臂垂直地面,活動臂對準鼻 子之下緣。電子數位式及液體擺錘式則置於頭頂。受測者作最大之頭椎伸展及屈 曲時測量其角度。每位測試者連續測三次。此外,受測者並於最大之頸椎伸展及 屈曲時攝取兩張X光片由另一位實驗者用量角器測量其角度當作標準值,與測得 值相比較。同時記錄三種不同測量工具從開始至角度讀取所需之時間。檢測結果 標準值為130度。電子數位式測得之平均值為126.9±7.4度、液體擺錘式測得平均 值為127.9±9.1度、而標準圓規雙臂式測得之平均值為94.2±16.9度。顯示電子數 位式及液體擺錘式測得值之值相當接近標準值,且標準偏差較小。又電子數位式 及液體擺錘式兩種工具所需之平均時間分別為10.4±2.5秒及10.6±3.3秒,和圓規 雙臂式26.1±13.4秒相比,平均所需之時間之t值分別為10.93及10.66,具統計學上 之意義(p<0.01)。因此電子數位式及液體擺錘式量角器作為測量頸部的節活動度 之工具,其效度信度較高且較為迅速。(中華物療誌 1993:18(2):191-195 |
英文摘要 | Accurate measurement of range ofmotion of joints is very important for the medi-cal personnel. The data are used for setting atreatment program, monitoring of the progressand evaluating the treatment effect. Theobjective measurement will also help to moti-vate the patient by informing the progress.Many instruments have been used to measurethe range of motion of the neck. The diverse in-struments and techniques used in defining cer-vical spine mobility reflect the difficulty of ac-curate measurement of range of motion in neckextension and flexion by three different instru-ments, i.e. universal goniometer (OG GLKENCo.), fluid-based inclinometer (ISOMEO)and electronic digital inclinometer (CYBEXED1320). Standard value of neck motion was defined as 130 degrees which was measuredfrom lateral views of X-rays at neck flexion andextension positions. Both fluid-based inclinometer and electronic digital inclinometer have thesuperior validity than universal goniometer bycomparing the means and standard deviationsof range of motion to the standard value(127.9±9.1 & 126.9±7.4 degrees vs. 94.2±16.9degrees ). According to the time comsumptionmeasurement, inclinometers are more convenience than goniometer (10.6±3.3 & 10.4±2.5sec. vs. 26.1±13.4 sec.). In conclusion, the fluidbased inclinometer and electronic digital inclinometer are superior to the universal goniometer in validity, reliability and convenience.(JPTA ROC 1993; 18(2): 191-195) |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。