第1筆 /總和 1 筆
/ 1 筆
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 國民中學教務主任角色之研究 (摘要) |
---|---|
作者 | 陳春雄; | 書刊名 | 國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊 |
卷期 | 28 1986.06[民75.06] |
頁次 | 頁175-186 |
分類號 | 523.57063 |
關鍵詞 | 主任; 國中; 教務; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study is to investigate the role expectation, the role performance and role candidate of the director of instruction (dean of studies of junior high school in Taiwan). The sample consisted of 267 junior high school principals and 281 directors of instruction drawn from public junior high schools in Taiwan Province, Taipei City and Kaohsiung City. The questionnaire, developed by the writer, were administered to the subjects: The obtained data were statistically treated by t-test, analysis of variance and Spearman rank-correlation coefficient. The main findings of this study were as follows: 1. On the whole, the role expectations of the junior high school principals for the director of instruction were significantly higher than those of the directors of instruction for themselves, whereas the role performances of the directors of instruction evaluated by their junior high school principals were lower than those of the directors of instruction to themselves on two aspects, including the school principal assistant and the director of a division. 2. For the role expectations of the directors of instruction expressed by the junior high school principals, there were no significant variances on their different backgrounds of adimistrative experiences, number of Classes and locations of school where they served, except that the subjects of different educations varied significantly. For the role expectations of the directors of instruction expressed by themselves, subjects of different backgrounds including educations, administrative experiences and number of classes of schools varied significantly, except that subjects of different locations of school had no significant variances. 3. For the role performances of the directors of instruction evaluated by the junior high school principals, subjects of different backgrounds including educations, administrative experiences and locations of school had no significant variances. For the role performances of the directors of instruction evaluated by themselves, the directors of instruction of different backgrounds including educations, administrative experiences‘locations of schools and number of classes of schools varied significantly. 4. For the best candidates of the directors of instruction, three dimensions of the result were as follows: (1) The two important motivations for the directors to play their roles were the appreciation from their principals. and their. ambitions to perform educational ideal. (2) The two important qualifications needed by them were the administrative skills and leadership and the moral characters. (3) The two important personal characteristics needed by them were the enthusiasm to do their work and the responsibilities for their tasks. Based on the findings mentioned above, the writer gives the following suggestions: 1. To strengthen the self recognition of the role of the directors of instruction. 2. The directors of instruction must have better performance about their professional leadership on four aspects including curriculum, academic studies and an evaluation of instruction and research on instruction. 3. For the best candidate of the directors of instruction, those who graduated from teacher's colleges. and having good administrative experiences must be taken into important considerations. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。