頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | A Comparative Study of Shui Jih-More and Kim So Worl=徐志摩與金素月的比較 |
---|---|
作 者 | 王海倫; | 書刊名 | 國立臺北商專學報 |
卷 期 | 47 1996.12[民85.12] |
頁 次 | 頁1-33 |
分類號 | 812.11 |
關鍵詞 | 人道主義; 浪漫主義; 現代格律詩; Humanitarianism; Romanticism; Modern rhythmic poetry; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 詩是人類的心聲,也是人類最誠摯感情的流露。徐志摩是民國初年最受景仰的詩人之一,也是新文學的巨匠。他在中國詩壇的地位有如英國的雪萊,這位天才橫溢,充滿熱情的文學家,雖未能得享長壽,卻也留下了許多不朽的詩篇與文章,他的才氣為許多人所讚賞,而他對中國文學的貢獻亦屬不可磨滅,在他的詩作裡,既可找到浪漫主義的色彩,又可尋獲人道主義的理想。更可貴的是他綜合了東西詩作的格調與技巧創作出中國代格律詩,為文壇開拓了一個新的方向。金素月則是韓國近代詩人中代表性人物之一,他在韓國詩壇的地位與徐志摩在中國詩壇的地位相似,他也是一位天才詩人,充滿著對本土故鄉的情感,他的詩作傳頌全國,而他對傳統的堅持,對民施的眷戀更膾炙人口,迄今為止,他仍為韓國最受歡迎的詩人。由於中韓兩國均屬東方文化的範圍,而徐志摩與金素月背景神似,同屬英華早逝,更為兩國象徵性的詩文名家,故此,對徐、金兩氏的詩作加以比較應為最有價值之事,本文擬採取選擇的方式在中韓兩國大詩人的名作中擷取精華加以論述,從而分析渠等的思想、詩的特性與風格,比較其異同,在架構上力求嚴謹,期盼由點而面、由骨而肉,刻劃出詩人的種種。本文第一部分闡釋徐志摩詩文學的特性;第二部分說明徐志摩詩的人道理想;第三部分敘述金 素月詩文學的特色;第四部分則研析金素月詩的韻律及思想;第五部分則詳細比較兩者的異同。 |
英文摘要 | Poetry is man's voice from the heart, and the most sincere expression ofhuman emotions. Shui Jib-More is one of China's most worshipped poets duringthe early twentieth century. He is also a master and key figure of New LiteratureMovement. His position is akin to England's Shelly. Jih-More is a genius and awriter full of passion. Though being unable to enjoy long life, he has left lots ofimmortal pieces of poems and articles. His great talent is highly praised. And hiscontributions to Chinese Literature is also indelible. Both the hue of romanticismand the ideal of humanitarianism can be found in his poems. What's more, hecombined Eastern and Western poetic styles and techniques to create modernChinese rhythmic poems, which points a new direction for literary world. Kirn So Worl is one of Korea's most worshipped poets, a position akin toChina's Shui Jih- More. He is also a poet of genius. His poems, widely read in thewhole nation, are full of passion towards his native country. He is also praised forhis insistence on tradition and nostalgia for his nation. Uniti today, he is still themost popular poet in Korea. It is worth making a comparison research on poems of Kirn So Worl and that of Shui Jih- More because, first, both China and Korea are under the influence of Eastern culture; second, Shui and Kim share similar background their early deaths and positions in China and Korea respectively. The approach of comparison is adopted in this essay by discussing selected poems of the two poets, so as to analyze the thought of the poets and to compare similarities and differences of the characteristics and styles of their poems. In terms of structure, it is arranged as meticulous as possible in order to carry out the best analysis. The literary characteristics ofJih-More's poetry will be discussed in the first part of the essay (Chapter II). In the second part (Chapter III ), thehumanitarian ideals of Jih-More's poetry will be explained. While the literarycharacteristics of So Worl's poetry will be discussed in the third part (Chapter VI). As to the rhythm and thought of So Worl's poetry will be analyzed in the fourthpart (Chapter V). Then in the final part, the similarities and differences betweenthe two poets and their work will be expounded in detail. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。