查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 高中生情境式STEM跨領域問題解決能力評量工具之發展--以南方澳跨港大橋情境為例
- 花蓮市高中生之性知識、態度和行為調查
- 高雄市公私立高中高職學生同儕影響與其婚前性行為與態度關係之研究
- 從發展理論談高中生的「心靈改革」
- 從社會認同理論探討高中生傾向科學的態度與科學本質的理解
- 高中生批判思考能力相關因素之研究
- 十六歲高中女生之坐式生活型態在健康體適能之影響分析研究
- Daily Life Stress and Its Correlates among High School Students in Hualien City
- 智優學生與普通學生記憶策略之比較研究
- 彰化高級中學高一高二學生生活適應概況調查報告
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 高中生情境式STEM跨領域問題解決能力評量工具之發展--以南方澳跨港大橋情境為例=Development of a Contextualized STEM Interdisciplinary Problem-Solving Skill Tool for Senior High School Students: Utilizing the Nanfang'ao Cross-Harbor Bridge as an Exemplar |
---|---|
作 者 | 林坤誼; 謝雨蓁; 許瑛玿; 陳柏熹; 吳心楷; 楊凱琳; | 書刊名 | 教科書研究 |
卷 期 | 16:3 2023.12[民112.12] |
頁 次 | 頁1-33 |
分類號 | 521.422 |
關鍵詞 | 跨領域問題解決能力; STEM教育; 評量工具; 南方澳跨港大橋; 高中生; Interdisciplinary problem-solving skill; STEM education; Assessment tool; Nanfang'ao bridge; Senior-high-school student; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
DOI | 10.6481/JTR.202312_16(3).01 |
中文摘要 | 現階段推動STEM教育的主要問題之一是缺乏適切的評量工具,以致於難以評估學生在STEM課程中的學習表現。本研究主要以南方澳跨港大橋情境為例,開發一個可用於評估高中生STEM跨領域問題解決能力的評量工具,其構面包含情境解構、類比推理、預測分析、量化思維、反思能力等5項能力。本研究的施測對象為844位高中生,採用 Rasch二元計分模式進行考驗,以提出一份能夠有效評量STEM跨領域問題解決能力的評量工具。整體而言,高中生在STEM跨領域問題解決能力的整體表現有待改善,尤其是在預測分析和反思能力這兩項能力需要更進一步的學習和努力。依據前述研究結果,本研究進一步討論可能的研究限制,並針對未來相關研究所應重視的議題提出討論,並且針對現場教師在課堂中引用與實施提供相關建議,以供未來研究參考。 |
英文摘要 | A challenge in advancing STEM education is the absence of appropriate assessment tools for evaluating the learning performance of students in STEM courses. This study aimed to develop an assessment tool for the STEM interdisciplinary problem-solving skills of high school students. The Nanfang’ao Bridge serves as the case study for this tool. The proposed research tool consists of five dimensions: contextualization, analogical reasoning, predicting, quantitative thinking, and reflective ability. The study surveyed 844 high school students and employed the Rasch dichotomous scoring model to develop an effective assessment tool for the STEM interdisciplinary problem-solving competencies of these students. The findings suggest that high school students need to improve their competencies, especially those in predictive analysis and reflective ability. This study also discusses potential limitations and highlights critical considerations for future investigations in this field. Furthermore, it provides recommendations for classroom teachers regarding the implementation and integration of the assessment tool, and the results serve as a reference for future research. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。