查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 侵害陪伴動物之慰撫金賠償與界限=Recovery of the Owner's Non-pecuniary Loss and Its Limitation When Companion Animals Are Wrongful Damaged |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳汝吟; | 書刊名 | 東吳法律學報 |
卷 期 | 30:3 2019.01[民108.01] |
頁 次 | 頁45-96 |
分類號 | 584.2 |
關鍵詞 | 侵權行為; 人格權; 情感利益; 慰撫金; 損害賠償; 陪伴動物; 寵物; Torts; Personal rights; Sentimental value; Recovery of non-pecuniary loss; Compensation; Companion animal; Pet; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 陪伴動物是現代社會許多人情感利益所繫,本文借鏡比較法例上瑞士、日本民法及美國等立法與司法實務裁判之新近發展,分析在臺灣現行法律架構下,侵害動物之慰撫金請求是否可行,並提出以陪伴動物之內涵概念、飼主人格利益須證明受有損害、以及加害人主觀要件上限於故意及重大過失等為界線,可謂民法第195條第1項前段之「情節重大」;同時斟酌飼主責任,體現損害賠償正義,落實與有責任之損害歸責原理。藉此希望法律可反映社會現況,提供此方面後續法學研究參考。 |
英文摘要 | The sentimental value ties that owners feel towards their companion animals in modern society. This article review comparative legislation and judicial practices from Swiss and Japanese Civil Code, as well as substantial changes in the U.S. in recent years. To ensure the justice in compensation, I'll bring up proposals for reasonable interpretation of Article 195 "wrongfully damaged in a severe way", which is in accordance with tort purposes and allow for damages for their genuine mental anguish; meanwhile, I'll line the requirements with the concept of pets, burden of proof, and offender's Intentional or gross negligence Infliction. This may not only meet the society's expectations but also facilitate legal research and legislative action. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。