頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 如何縮短審稿者與撰稿者的距離=How to Shorten the Distance between Editors and Authors |
---|---|
作者 | 林子舜; 廖玲巧; 古博仁; | 書刊名 | 藥學雜誌 |
卷期 | 35:2=139 2019.06[民108.06] |
頁次 | 頁140-145 |
分類號 | 418 |
關鍵詞 | 審稿流程; 文獻引用; 資訊系統; Review process; Literature citation; Information system; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 編輯委員審稿宜有一定共識及標準,本誌在2018年10月20-21日所召開之共識會 議中,藉由分享經統整後之審稿意見,以期審稿意見用詞的一致性,簡化審稿流程, 提升雜誌定期發行的質與量。目的:將審查委員的回饋意見加以統整分析,並以標準 化用詞加以分類,進而規劃資訊系統的架構,以推動雜誌審查資訊化。方法:將50篇 文章共101張審查意見表內的各點意見歸納成文章修辭、文獻引用相關、圖表相關建 議、已依建議修改-同意刊登、文章架構相關、摘要相關、正面鼓勵作者、建議修改 文章標題、退稿、強化疾病史與文章主題的關聯性⋯等大類後,採累計統計分析其 百分比。結果:各大類的百分比由高而低依序是:文章修辭 (168.0%)、文獻引用相關 (122.0%)、圖表相關建議 (92.0%)、已依建議修改-同意刊登文章 (54.0%)、文章架構相 關 (52.0%)、摘要相關 (48.0%)。討論與建議:五花八門的審稿意見若能轉為格式化的 選項,利於委員共識形成,甚至用以規劃審稿的資訊系統,才能更精準快速地將審查 意見回饋給作者,使藥學雜誌的質與量與日俱進。 |
英文摘要 | The editorial committee should have certain consensus and standards for the feedback of editor. In the consensus meeting held on October 20-21, 2018, the result of analysis will be used to get consistency of wording, simplifying the review process, and improving the quality and quantity of the journal’s regular issue; Purpose: All of the feedback of the editor is analyzed and classified by standardized terms, and then the structure of the information system is planned to promote the journal to be reviewed by this system. Method: The opinions from the editors in the 50 articles were majorly categorized into the article rhetoric, the literature citations related, the chart related suggestions, revision according to the proposal of editor and consent to publish, the article structure related suggestions, the abstract related suggestions, positive encouragement to author, the suggestion to modify the article title, rejection of the manuscript, and strengthening the association between disease history and article theme...etc., after then, the cumulative statistical analysis in percentage was performed. Results: the percentage of each major category was shown in order from high to low as following: article rhetoric (168.0 %), reference citation related (122.0%), chart related suggestions (92.0%), revision according to the proposal of editor and consent to publish (54%), article structure related suggestions (52.0%), abstract related suggestions (48.0%). Discussion and suggestion: If various review opinions can be converted into formatted options, which will facilitates the formation of consensus among editorial members, and even the information system for editorial committee, can more accurately and quickly feedback the review opinions to the author, making the quality and publishing of the journal keep progressively improved day by day. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。