查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 它是「怪物」?--《科學怪人》的「怪物」及「性別」特質
- The Dialectic of Law and Desire in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: A Lacanian Reading
- A Tentative Approach to Re-interpreting Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus in Literacy-oriented English Curriculum in the Context of the Twelve-year Basic Education
- 「科學怪人」一百八十年--典範轉移.女性主義科學.文化研究
- 麥可喬登的動畫版自傳--「怪物奇兵」
- 當癥候本身變成一種樂趣(而最後終結了意義的枷鎖)--從「科學怪人」、「吸血鬼」與「活死人」的變體談同志主體位置的可能性
- 布萊納陰影下的--「瑪麗雪萊的科學怪人」
- 重述與開放:評巴特勒的《造就身體》
- 當科學怪人遇見了多媒體[Mary Shelley著 于而彥譯 «Frankenstein»]
- 從科學怪人到人造新娘
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 它是「怪物」?--《科學怪人》的「怪物」及「性別」特質=Is It a “Monster”?--“Monster” and “Monstrosity” in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein |
---|---|
作者 | 陳樹信; Chan, Herbert Shu-shun; |
期刊 | 英美文學評論 |
出版日期 | 20050800 |
卷期 | 8 民94.08 |
頁次 | 頁153-182 |
分類號 | 874.57 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 科學怪人; 瑪麗.雪萊; 巴特勒; 二元性別; 怪物; 怪物特質; Fankenstein; Mary Shelley; Judith Butler; Dichotomy in sex; Dichotomy in gender; Monster; Monstrosity; Body construction; Gender construction; |
中文摘要 | 瑪麗.雪萊小說《科學怪人》裡的「創造物」,在獲得生命那一剎,就被它的創造者法蘭皙斯坦宣告為「怪物」。不單這樣,小說裡幾乎所有人(狄萊西老先生除外)都一致認為,它是「怪物」。其理由十分簡單,只不過是醜陋而已。除此以外,似乎沒有說出甚麼特別的理由。本文認為,那「言詮不落」之處,才是它被視為「怪物」的主因。運用巴特勒的理論去解讀「怪物」的身體建構過程,可公發現其實那「創造物」踰越了性別二分的疆界,所公大家都用各種暴力對待它,視它為「怪物」。那「創造物」的際遇直指二元性別的脆弱。 |
英文摘要 | The “creature” in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is named as a “monster” by its creator, Frankenstein, at the very moment of its reanimation. Not only its creator calls it a “monster,” but also all the characters in the novel (except old De Lacey). Although these people regard it as monster and punish it with different means, the only excuse they hold is that—it is hideous. They do not attempt to give any convincing reasons beyond this. This essay attempts to argue that the “unspeakable” facts are the reason why people regard it as a “monster” without any hesitation. As the people all call it a monster at first sight by judging it with visual codes, it is the monster’s body that matters. Employing Judith Butler’s theory to decipher its body construction, it is able to discover that the “creature” trespasses the dichotomized sex/gender codes; therefore, people police the social norm by calling it a “monster.” The “creature’s” experience exposes the frailty of the dichotomy in sex/gender. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。