查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Comparison among LigaSure, Harmonic Scalpel, and Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy for Symptomatic Hemorrhoids
- Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy with PPH-33 Versus Conventional Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy--Preliminary Analysis in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- 實施臨床路徑對痔瘡切除手術醫療資源利用的影響
- The Roles of Hemorrhoidectomy and Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids--Clinical and Manometric Study
- Impact of Placement of Anal Tampon on Quality of In-patient Care in Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Patients: Comparison between Short-term Placement and Overnight Placement
- Comparison of the Surgical Results of Hemorrhoidectomy under Intravenous General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia
- 比較吻合器痔瘡切除術與超音波引導痔瘡動脈結紮術,何者為較佳的痔瘡手術選擇?
- Comparison of Surgical Results of Hemorrhoidectomy under Intravenous General Anesthesia and Heavy Sedation
- Staple Hemorrhoidectomy--A Modified Low Transection Technique of PPH
- Feasibility of Transanal Repair of Rectocele
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Comparison among LigaSure, Harmonic Scalpel, and Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy for Symptomatic Hemorrhoids=使用組織凝集器(LigaSure)、諧波刀(Harmonic scalpel)切除痔瘡與傳統痔瘡手術之比較 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 林怡成; 黃允中; 朱峻廷; 方川尹; 朱峻延; | 書刊名 | 中華民國大腸直腸外科醫學會雜誌 |
卷期 | 30:3 2019.09[民108.09] |
頁次 | 頁127-134 |
分類號 | 416.245 |
關鍵詞 | 織凝集器; 諧波刀; 痔瘡切除術; LigaSure; Harmonic scalpel; Hemorrhoidectomy; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 目的:比較組織凝集器(LigaSure)、諧波刀(Harmonic scalpel)切除痔瘡與傳統痔瘡手術的結果。方法:收集並統計自2018年7月至2019年1月間,第三與第四級痔瘡使用組織凝集器、諧波刀手術及傳統痔瘡切除手術進行比較。共50位病人分為三組,比較彼此之間各方面的差別。結果:使用組織凝集器及諧波刀進行痔瘡切除手術比傳統痔瘡手術能有效減少開刀時間及術中流血量;而且在住院天數、術後疼痛和術後施打止痛藥劑數用組織凝集器及諧波刀進行痔瘡切除手術也是明顯優於傳統痔瘡手術。結論:使用組織凝集器(LigaSure)或諧波刀(Harmonic Scalpel)進行痔瘡切除手術,能夠比傳統手術達到更好的結果。 |
英文摘要 | Purpose. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of LigaSure and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy with those of conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Methods. We assessed patients with Grade III or IV hemorrhoids who underwent LigaSure, Harmonic Scalpel, or conventional hemorrhoidectomy from July 2018 to January 2019. A total of 50 patients were included in this study. Results. The patients were divided into three groups: conventional (n = 18), LigaSure (n = 16), and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy (n = 16). The median operation time was 17.5 min for the LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy group, 18.75 min for the Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy group, and 28.89 min for the conventional hemorrhoidectomy group (p < 0.001). Further, intraoperative blood loss and pain scores were significantly lower in the LigaSure and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy groups than in the conventional hemorrhoidectomy group (p < 0.001). The median number of analgesic injections used during admission and hospital days was lower in the LigaSure and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy groups than in the conventional hemorrhoidectomy group (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed in terms of the incidence of early postoperative complications. Conclusions. LigaSure and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy provide a superior alternative to conventional hemorrhoidectomy owing to shorter operation time and length of hospital stay as well as lower postoperative pain, volume of blood loss, and analgesic requirements. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。