查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 中文晤談評量問卷內部結構及信效度之探究:諮商心理師層次分析
- 中文晤談評量問卷內部結構之探究:個案層次分析
- 試解析現代漢語反義詞聚之語義結構性質與類型
- 漢語的複合動詞「X得」:內部結構與外部功能
- The Internal Structure and Development of Aquaculture in Taiwan
- The Torsion Test and Its Role in Constitutive Equations for Metals
- 語言分析與華語教學
- ВНУTPEHHЯЯ ФOPMA ФPAЗEOЛОΓИЗΜОΒ КAК ПΡΕДΜΕΤ COПOCTABИΤΕЛЬНОЙ ЛИНΓΒИСΤИКИ: HA ПΡИΜΕΡΕ ΕУССКИX И КИΤAЙСКИX ФΡΑЗΕОЛОΓИЗΜОΒ С ЧИСЛΤΕЛЬНЬІΜИ
- 華語和閩南語的「反義並列式複合詞」:分類、結構和語意分析
- On Mandarin Chinese DP-internal Structure, Interpretations, and Operator-binding
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 中文晤談評量問卷內部結構及信效度之探究:諮商心理師層次分析=A Study of Internal Structure, Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Session Evaluation Questionnaire (C-SEQ): Counselor-level Analyses |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳慶福; 劉嘉蕙; | 書刊名 | 國立屏東大學學報. 教育類 |
卷 期 | 3 2019.04[民108.04] |
頁 次 | 頁111-143 |
分類號 | 178.4 |
關鍵詞 | 中文晤談評量問卷; 內部結構; 晤談影響; Chinese session evaluation questionnaire; C-SEQ; Internal structure; Session impact; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 晤談評量問卷(Session Evaluation Questionnaire, SEQ)過去經常被作為評量諮商影響的用途,最新版SEQ-5係由21對語意區分的相對應形容詞組成,各題項採1-7點評量的方式計分。本研究探討心理師在中文第五版晤談評量問卷(Chinese Session Evaluation Questionnaire, C-SEQ)的內部結構,以2017年4月至2017年7月間,在台灣34所大學諮商輔導中心的心理師N = 187為參與者,以每位參與者最近一次接案後所填答的一份C-SEQ,共計187份,探討心理師在C-SEQ的因素結構、C-SEQ的內部相關和內部一致性。研究結果:以C-SEQ晤談評量向度和晤談後情感評量向度各10題,進行探索性因素分析,結果顯示C-SEQ在晤談評量向度,和在晤談後情感向度分別包含:深度性、順暢性,以及正向性和覺醒性四個因素的結構,C-SEQ在深度性、順暢性和正向性間存有低度到中度的相關(rs = .16 - .64, ps < .05),以及C-SEQ四個因素具有中高度的內部一致性信度(α = .57-.87),整體問卷具有高度的一致性信度(α = .87)。心理師層次的C-SEQ可作為諮商歷程實務和諮商研究之用途。 |
英文摘要 | The Session Evaluation Questionnaire(SEQ) has been applied to measure the impact of counseling sessions. The SEQ Form 5 (the most recent version) includes 21 items in a 7-point bipolar adjective format. The items are divided into two sections: session evaluation and postsession mood evaluation. The stem 'This session was' precedes the first 11 items(session evaluation). The stem 'Right now I feel' precedes the second 10 items (postsession mood evaluation). The purpose of this research attempts to explore the internal structure of the Chinese Session Evaluation(C-SEQ) of counselor level. The C-SEQ data were collected in a heterogeneous convenience sample of 187 participants at 34 universities in Taiwan, with each participant completed one copy of C-SEQ over the course of her/his latest individual counseling, and data collecting were from April, 2017 to July, 2017. The findings of this study indicated that the counselors showed actual responses toward the C-SEQ. The results of this study suggested that four factors elicited from the C-SEQ were corroborated, namely Depth, Smoothness, Positivity, and Arousal. Thus, the C-SEQ is comprised of two dimensions of session evaluation, Depth and Smoothness, as well as two dimensions of postsession mood, Positivity and Arousal. The C-SEQ yields four factors. And intercorrelation among depth, smoothness and positivity of C-SEQ has been low to medium(rs = .16 - .64 , ps< .05). The internal consistency coefficients(Cronbach's α) of the four factors has been middle to high(α = .57 - .87), and the total internal consistency of the C-SEQ has been high(α = .87). The C-SEQ is available as an instrument for counseling practice and research. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。