查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 國小校長文化回應領導意涵探究與指標建構
- 校長文化回應領導之研究:以新北市一所國小為例
- 競值途徑應用在學校組織行為分析之研究
- 一位初任小學校長第一個月的心路歷程分析
- The Impact of Principal Leadership upon School Culture in a Basic School: A Case Study
- 校長領導的影響:近三十年來研究結果的分析
- 建構文化回應教學模式:一個多族群班級的教學實驗
- 文化回應教學:理論、研究與實踐[Geneva Gay ed., «Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice»]
- 建構式的領導初探:以兩所教育實驗國小的關鍵領導人為例
- 臺灣近十年教育領導碩博士論文分析:女性主義的觀點
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 國小校長文化回應領導意涵探究與指標建構=A Study of Contents and Constructing the Indicators of Culturally Responsive Leadership for Elementary School Principals |
---|---|
作者 | 江姮姬; Chiang, Heng-chi; |
期刊 | 臺北市立大學學報. 教育類 |
出版日期 | 20190600 |
卷期 | 50:1 2019.06[民108.06] |
頁次 | 頁45-68 |
分類號 | 526.42 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 文化回應; 校長領導; 文化回應領導; Culturally responsive; School leader; Culturally responsive leadership; |
中文摘要 | 本研究係探究文化回應領導意涵,以建構國小校長文化回應領導指標,並探討指標各層面、指標及參考具體作為的必要性、重要性與特色分析;採焦點團體(focus group)與模糊德懷術法(Fuzzy Delphi Method, FDM);研究工具為「國小校長文化回應領導指標」;問卷調查小組由學者專家與國小校長組成,發現指標的三層級內容的重要性與特色分析,結論如下:(1)本指標含3個層面、14個指標和43個參考具體作為,每一層面、指標與參考具體作為均具必要性。三個層面中以「文化素養的體現」重要程度最高;指標部分以「文化素養引領」重要程度最高;參考具體作為以發展文化和諧環境、檢視教學成效,和檢視文化回應素養領導團隊的辦學成效,三者重要程度最高。(2)「文化覺察的知能」下的參考具體作為中,以校長敘說自我文化價值之重要程度最高;「文化知識的實踐」下的參考具體作為,以正式課程融入多元文化議題和非正式課程培養學生的多元文化知能重要程度最高。本調查中的兩極專家意見沒有衝突,顯示有共識。本文最後針對未來之校長專業發展,提供教育行政、校長及未來研究之建議。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study is to explore the contents of culturally responsive leadership, construct indicators of culturally responsive leadership for elementary school principals and then analyze the necessity, importance, characteristic of indicators. The focus group and the Fuzzy Delphi Method are used. The research instrument is "The Indicators of Culturally Responsive Leadership for Elementary School Principals"; the questionnaire team are consisted of scholars and principals. The research finding with the analysis of indicators' importance and characteristics in three-level are found as follows: (1) The indicators include three dimensions, fourteen standards and forty-three reference behaviors. Each dimensions, indicators and reference behaviors are necessary. "Cultural proficiency" is given the highest rank among the three dimensions. "Cultural literacy" is given highest rank among the fourteen standards. "Developing culturally environment", "evaluating teaching effectiveness" as well as "inspecting culturally response leadership team's effectiveness" are given highest rank among these reference behaviors. (2) "Describing self-culture value by principals" is given highest rank among the reference behaviors of the "cultural awareness" dimension. "Developing multicultural issues in formal curriculum" and "developing students' multicultural ability in informal curriculum" are given highest rank among the reference behaviors of the "cultural knowledge" dimension. The opinions of bipolar experts are consistent, which indicates they reach a consensus based on the survey. Finally, some suggestions are presented to educational administration, principals, and further studies. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。