查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 羽球教練領導行為之研究=A Study of Badminton Coaches' Leadership Behavior |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄭賀珍; 陳盛彬; 萬捷雄; 蘇榮立; | 書刊名 | 中原體育學報 |
卷 期 | 7 2015.12[民104.12] |
頁 次 | 頁45-57 |
分類號 | 528.953 |
關鍵詞 | 羽球選手; 教練領導行為; 成績表現; Badminton players; Coaches' leadership behavior; Achievement performance; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究主要目的在瞭解國中以上羽球選手知覺教練領導行為與各團體不同成績表現的差異性。研究工具共分為二個部份:第一部份為選手基本資料;第二部份為知覺的教練領導行為量表。以104年全國羽球團體賽國中以上羽球選手為樣本,並將所得資料經描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析,檢定其結果與發現。研究結果:一、女性選手知覺教練領導行為高於男性且達到顯著差異水準(p<.05)。二、不同訓練年數在教練領導行為中的訓練與指導、關懷、獎勵、民主、協議等五項因素構面,皆未達到顯著差異。三、不同參賽組別之選手,在知覺教練領導行為上呈現顯著差異。四、不同運動成績表現的選手在教練領導行為未達顯著水準(p>.05)。五、不同每週練習天數選手在知覺教練領導行為未達顯著差異水準(p>.05)。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of the research was to examine the perceived coaches’ leadership behavior among badminton players above secondary school levels and in order to find the different achievement performances between each team. Two parts of research tools were used: Part 1 was player’s personal data and Part 2 was the scaling of perceived coaches’ leadership. Data were collected through the use of a self-designed demographic information questionnaire. The research subjects of this study were players who participated in the first national ranking badminton tournament in 2015. The data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, One-way ANOVA and Scheffe’s method. Major research findings are as the following: 1. Female players were more perceived of coaches’ leadership behavior than male players reached significant differences (p<.05). 2. In coaches’ leadership behavior: there were no significant differences in different years of training on five dimensions: training and instruction, caring, positive feedback, democratic behavior and negotiating behavior. 3. There were significant differences in perception of coaches’ leadership behavior on players participating in different categories. 4. There were no significant differences in perception of coaches’ leadership behavior on players with different sport achievement performance (p>.05). 5. There were no significant differences (p < .05) in perception of coaches’ leadership behavior on players’ days of practice per week. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。