查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 即席發言同步口譯中譯英譯文邏輯銜接強化現象
- 各自語、互相語及其範圍語:回指語的詞匯及結構之間的語意特徵及呼應
- Return Target Address Prediction
- 華語學習者電腦寫作考試中「把」字後賓語間接回指的情形
- 從回指到承接--試論「就」與「即」承接功能的來源
- A Comparative Study of the Metadiscourse Analysis in EFL Textbooks in Japan and China
- 漢語被字句與回指中心過渡關係的研究
- “後社會學”或“多元話語分析”:社會研究模式新探索
- 勞工研究中的一個方法論問題 : 從多元話語分析的視角看
- 清華玖《廼命一》簡10-11「用各勉廼身」段釋義--兼解句中「廼(乃)」字的回指用法
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 即席發言同步口譯中譯英譯文邏輯銜接強化現象=Enhancement of Logical Cohesion in Chinese/English Simultaneous Interpreting for Impromptu Speakers |
---|---|
作 者 | 張嘉倩; | 書刊名 | 編譯論叢 |
卷期 | 10:2 2017.09[民106.09] |
頁次 | 頁119-151 |
分類號 | 818.7 |
關鍵詞 | 中英同步口譯; 邏輯銜接; 回指; 元話語; Chinese/English simultaneous interpreting; Logical cohesion; Anaphora; Metadiscourse; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 即席發言為會議口譯常見的原文形式。由於即席發言的邏輯銜接通常較為鬆散,口譯員為確保產出譯文能符合邏輯銜接的品質指標,在理解原文與產出譯文過程都可能需要花費更多氣力。本研究以篇章分析方式,比較學生口譯員與專業口譯員在面對中文講者即席發言時,如何確保譯文的邏輯銜接。採用的語料為一篇中文即席發言演講原文與8位口譯員的同步口譯英文譯文。為能清楚對照中文講者即席發言的邏輯銜接與口譯員產出英文譯文的邏輯銜接,本研究分析兩類邏輯銜接指標:回指關係與元話語。研究發現,整體來說,無論是學生或專業口譯員,對於中文講者即席發言時使用代詞回指或元話語的方式,並不會照單全收。口譯員在理解訊息過程中,會將特定代詞的回指對象在譯文中明確化,進而減輕觀眾的認知負擔,並使譯文更加簡潔。在元話語方面,口譯員雖傾向保留原講者的框架與過渡標記,但當原文講者因即席發言導致元話語使用不當時,口譯員也會就自身的理解,決定是否譯出或修正 |
英文摘要 | A common type of input for conference interpreters is impromptu speeches. With their generally looser logical structure, impromptu speeches can present unique challenges for interpreters, especially in terms of meeting the criteria of the "logical cohesion of utterance." This study examines the process as well as the quality of the Chinese-to- English simultaneous interpreting of an impromptu speech by eight interpreters- four professionals and four trainees-in order to see if interpreters may need to exert more effort in the interpreting process. Two types of cohesion criteria were adopted, anaphora and metalanguage, to compare the levels of cohesion between the source and the target texts. The results show that both professional and student interpreters tended to make certain types of anaphora explicit in their renditions, possibly in an attempt to make their interpreting more succinct and understandable. In addition, the interpreters usually preserved the frame and transition markers used by the speaker in their renditions. But when those meta-discourse markers were used inappropriately due to lack of planning, interpreters might change or delete the markers based on their own understanding |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。