查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Improvement of Pain Control in Palliative/Hospice Home Care: Experience of a Single Institution
- 末期腎臟病的安寧緩和照顧
- 居家照顧在安寧緩和醫療中的重要性
- 癌症疼痛控制應有的知識與態度
- A Prospective Study of Pain Treatment for Patients with Advanced Cancer Who Receive Hospice Home Care
- The Role of Mindfulness in Hospice & Palliative Care in Taiwan
- 某社區醫院安寧病房癌末病人轉入前疼痛控制處方的適當性
- 臨床心理師在安寧緩和療護中的角色
- 安寧緩和醫療知識態度臨床技能問卷調查文獻分析
- 癌痛病患疼痛控制信念、殘障信念、感覺特質及其相關性之探討
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Improvement of Pain Control in Palliative/Hospice Home Care: Experience of a Single Institution=安寧居家照護下的疼痛控制改善情形:某醫院的經驗 |
---|---|
作 者 | 劉惠文; 陳苓萍; 宋詠娟; | 書刊名 | 疼痛醫學雜誌 |
卷 期 | 26:1 2016.03[民105.03] |
頁 次 | 頁1-8 |
分類號 | 419.77 |
關鍵詞 | 疼痛控制; 癌症疼痛; 末期照顧; 緩和照顧; 安寧緩和; 居家照顧; Pain control; Cancer pain; Terminal care; Palliative care; Hospice; Home care; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 背景: 文獻回顧台灣的癌症門診病患於疾病惡化時疼痛分數為3.62至4.47分,末期病患 約有三分之二有中度以上疼痛,疼痛照顧尤需重视。由單一醫學中心的收案分析,了解 密集居家與電話訪視的安寧居家照護模式可改善病人的疼痛控制程度。 病人與方法: 回溯性分析國泰综合醫院接受安寧居家照護之病人,自2011年1月至2013年10月收案 兩週以上且接受疼痛藥物控制病人共79人,其中部份因病人死亡病歷封存於外地不可 得,有居家照護書面疼痛控制評估資料者共43人,排除無法使用疼痛视覺類比量表 (VAS)後,能參與分析者共33人。根據病歷回顧,VAS以收案起兩週為間距進行疼痛評估 分析,最長分析至收案後十週。統計方式使用paired t-test。 結果: 接受分析的案例33人中,女性佔20人(60.6%),男性佔13人(39.4%),平均年齡為 68.82歲,中位數為69歲,平均收案天數為118天,中位數為92天(標準差93.1)。收案時 33人VAS平均為4.82,中位數為5分,中度疼痛比例為57.6%,嚴重疼痛為18.2%,與收案 時VAS比較收案後兩週時VAS (29人)平均為4.79 vs. 2.28分(p<0.001),輕度疼痛病人 佔58.6%,另有20.7%不感到疼痛;安寧居家照護收案後兩週至八週皆顯著改善視覺類比 量表(VAS)的分數(p<0.001),於末期病人照顧過程中,至第四至十週追蹤之病人仍有六 成以上的輕度疼痛控制效果。 結論: 接受安寧缓和居家照護的病人的確可以改善其疼痛控制,第二週在含輕度疼痛以下 可達79.3%,至第八週都能顯著改善VAS分數(p<0.001)。 |
英文摘要 | Background: Review the pain score of Taiwan cancer outpatients when disease deterioration, the average score is 3.62 to 4.47 (0-10). Terminal cancer pain care is more important due to two-thirds patients with more than moderate level pain. From a single institution analysis, we knew the improvement of pain control in palliative home care mode with home visits and telephone visits. Patients and Methods: From January 2011 to October 2013, we retrospectively analyzed hospice home care patients, excluded less than 2 weeks, no available medical records, and patients could not use VAS table due to cognition. Total 33 patients were included in study finally. We analyzed VAS every 2 weeks till 10 weeks according to medical records. Statistics methods use paired t-test. Results: In 33 home care patients, there were 20 females (60.6%) and 13 males (39.4%). The average patient age was 68.82 year-old, median was 69 year-old. The average duration receiving home care was 118 days; median was 92 days (SD 93.l days). The baseline VAS of 33 patients was 4.82, median was 5, the moderate pain (VAS between 4 and 6) was 57.6% and severe pain (VAS more than 6) was 18.2%. The average VAS at 2 weeks was 2.28 compared to baseline 4.79 (N=29, p<0.001), and 58.6% patients felt mild pain even 20.7% felt no pain. During hospice home care, the VAS improved statistically at 2 weeks till 8 weeks. The pain level less than moderate status achieved 79.3% at 2 weeks and more than 60% even to 4-10 weeks. Conclusions: Patients received palliative/hospice home cares indeed improve pain control. The pain control with mild pain and no pain was 79.3% when 2 weeks, and VAS improved statistically till 8 weeks (p<0.001). |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。