查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 2015年民事法發展回顧
- 使用他人之物之不當得利與消滅時效
- 2011年民事法發展回顧
- 民法第二二七條之二增減給付或變更原有效果請求權之除斥期間及消滅時效問題--探討最高法院九十七年度臺上字第三六○號、九十七年度臺上字第一五四七號及九十九年度臺上字第八四三號民事判決
- 情事變更、形成之訴與消滅時效問題
- 一般情事變更權利行使之期間--評最高法院一○二年度臺再字第一八號民事判決
- 剖析代償請求權之本質與消滅時效之起算--以最高法院100年度臺上字第1833號判決為楔子
- 無權占有他人土地與相當於租金之不當得利--實證研究與政策建議
- [裁判簡評]請求權行使法律上障礙新類型之誕生?/最高院100臺上109
- 自力救濟的侵害型不當得利責任--最高法院九八年度臺上字第一○一二號判決
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 2015年民事法發展回顧=Developments in the Law in 2015: Civil Law |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳忠五; | 書刊名 | 國立臺灣大學法學論叢 |
卷 期 | 45:特刊 2016.11[民105.11] |
頁 次 | 頁1493-1566 |
分類號 | 584 |
關鍵詞 | 民法總則編修正; 民法親屬編修正; 民法繼承編修正; 表見代理; 消滅時效; 權利行使原則; 情事變更原則; 不當得利; 公同共有; 事實上夫妻; Amendment on civil code part I general principles; Amendment on civil code part IV family; Amendment on civil code part V succession; Apparent authority; Extinctive prescription; Abuse of rights or principle of good faith; Impracticability or frustration of purpose; Unjust enrichment; Ownership-in-common; De facto spouse; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文以2015年我國民事實體法的立法與司法發展為論述對象。2015年民事立法活動,有民法總則編、親屬編、繼承編部分條文修正,分別涉及失蹤人財產管理的法律適用、成年人監護制度上監護人資格的適度放寬、遺產管理人及遺囑執行人報酬制度的改革等。整體而言,其修正幅度不大,多屬技術性、細節性修正,未見立法政策重大更動。至於以「最高法院裁判」為主的民事司法活動,案例多元豐富,問題層出不窮,見解不斷演進,廣泛涉及民事法各次領域重要議題,對民事法理論形成或實務應用,卓著貢獻。其中最值得注意的司法實務發展,如表見代理、消滅時效制度、權利行使原則、情事變更原則、不當得利類型化與準用規定、公同共有債權行使、事實上夫妻等相關問題的最新實務見解。 |
英文摘要 | This article is to review and examine the major development of Taiwanese civil law in 2015, mainly focusing on the legislative amendments and judicial practices. Generally, the legislative activities were not alive. By contrast, the courts energetically proposed many creative opinions in order to cater to the social changes. The amendments of the Civil Code concerned Part I General Principles, Part IV Family and Part V Succession. Some few articles were modified but they did not substantially involve any important policy reconsideration. Conversely, the judicial practices, especially the Supreme Court judgments, made a considerable number of inspiring and influential decisions concerning diverse issues of civil law. The main issues dealt with by the Court concerned as followed: apparent authority, extinctive prescription, abuse of rights or principle of good faith, impracticability or frustration of purpose, unjust enrichment, ownership-in-common, de facto spouse etc. From these decisions, the Court demonstrated how they adapted to the changing needs of transitional society. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。