第1筆 /總和 1 筆
/ 1 筆
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 公民團體倡議策略與論述分析:以臺灣動物社會研究會反海豹油個案為例=An Analysis of the Advocacy Strategies and Discourse of a Citizen Group: The Anti-Seal Product Appeal by Environment and Animal Society of Taiwan |
---|---|
作者 | 黃惠萍; 黃惠萍; | 書刊名 | 傳播研究與實踐 |
卷期 | 6:2 2016.07[民105.07] |
頁次 | 頁243-283 |
分類號 | 541.96 |
關鍵詞 | 反海豹油訴求; 相互性原則; 倡議策略; 臺灣動物社會研究會; 論點品質; Anti-seal product appeal; Reciprocity principle; Advocacy strategy; Environment and Animal Society of Taiwan; Argument quality; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 公民社會自主力的提升與公民團體的倡議策略及論述能力有關,但相關探討有限。本研究以環保團體臺灣動物社會研究會的反海豹油個案為例,從公民團體倡議策略、公共審議相互性原則與訊息論點品質等觀點,分析該會推動訴求之策略、論述內涵與效應。分析發現,該會運用聯盟、困窘與資訊策略推動訴求,論述重視道德論證、理據與邏輯合理性,呼應相互性原則及強論點之要求,有助於媒體報導及公眾對訴求的瞭解與支持。公民團體倡議前如能投入議題研究,建構符合相互性原則之強論述,並運用聯盟及資訊等策略,應可擴大影響力、促進公民參與。 |
英文摘要 | Civil society becomes autonomous when citizen groups are strong in advocacy strategies and public discourse. However, limited research attention has been paid to this topic. This study uses the perspectives of advocacy strategies, the reciprocity principle from public deliberation and message argument quality to analyze the "Anti- Seal Product" campaign promoted by Environment and Animal Society of Taiwan (EAST). Results show that EAST used cooperation, embarrassment, and information strategies to promote this appeal. Promotional texts from EAST emphasized moral reasoning, evidence and logical consistency, particularly reciprocity and strong arguments, which helped reporters cover the appeal and also helped the public understand and support it. This suggests that to successfully advocate causes citizen groups must invest in research work to gather information and evidence. Moreover, promotional texts based on reciprocity and strong arguments, as well as strategies such as cooperation and information, may also help citizen groups expand their influence and promote citizen engagement. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。