頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 評析高中美術教科書中的臺灣當代藝術=Examination of Taiwan’s Contemporary Art: Discourse Analysis of Contemporary Art in Taiwan in High School Textbooks |
---|---|
作 者 | 褚天安; | 書刊名 | 教科書研究 |
卷 期 | 2:2 2009.12[民98.12] |
頁 次 | 頁87-110 |
分類號 | 523.749 |
關鍵詞 | 論述分析; 教科書研究; 臺灣當代藝術; 高中美術教科書; Discourse analysis; Textbook research; Contemporary art in Taiwan; High school art textbooks; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 褚天安1 本文以現有高中兩版本具有臺灣當代藝術單元的教科書作為研 究對象,運用論述分析的方法對兩版本教科書文本進行分析。 本研究所分析高中美術教科書中的臺灣當代藝術論述情形為: 一、當代藝術是臺灣藝術發展史裡的一段時期,但是不一定是「更 好」、「進化版」,不宜用新、舊的二分法劃分藝術的進程。二、教科 書對於臺灣當代藝術的多元現象的論述是相對於「傳統學院派」而 言,且較偏重媒材的多元性。三、K 版教科書對於臺灣當代藝術的論 述較為籠統,選取的藝術家也比較不完整,從其學習目標來看:對於 臺灣當代藝術「未來發展的遠景」僅止於專業美術教育的部分,也無 法看出要如何「增進對這塊土地的認同」。四、H 版當代藝術的論述 範圍跟K 版非常接近,但是對臺灣當代藝術的特點透過比較的方式 歸納相關知識,在論述上較具系統性,但是受制於年代的劃分而使得 介紹上容易產生鄉土/當代二元對立的矛盾論述。 本文也試圖提出一些對於臺灣當代藝術教材設計的看法,並期待 更多美術教科書的後設研究。 |
英文摘要 | This article selects two editions of a high school textbook with chapters on contemporary art in Taiwan. We borrow the language use and social production of discourse analysis to analyze the text of the two editions. From the above discourse analysis, it is possible to summarize the present status of contemporary art in Taiwan as it is presented in high school textbooks. It is as follows: (1) contemporary art represents the development of art in a certain period of time in the history of art in Taiwan, but here development does not necessarily mean “improvement” or “evolutionary.” For that reason, it is not suitable to distinguish modern art and traditional art as a dichotomy. (2) In Taiwan diversified discourse of contemporary art in textbooks is compared to traditional art by focusing more on the diversity of media or materials. (3) The “K” edition of the textbook is more generalized on the discourse of contemporary art in Taiwan, and the selection of artists is quite incomplete from a learning perspective. The topic “Future Development of Contemporary Art in Taiwan” is limited to professional arts education, and we do not see any discussion on “how to promote the understanding of our mother land.” (4) The “H” edition’s discourse on contemporary art is very similar to the “K” edition, but the main difference is “H” takes a more systematic approach by presenting the characteristics of contemporary art in Taiwan through a series of relevant knowledge comparisons. But some contradicting discourse stems from the fact that “realistic” artworks are categorized by time periods, resulting in two opposing views: local versus contemporary art. This study proposes several ideas on textbooks for contemporary art in Taiwan, and hopes that more research can be done for art textbooks in the future. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。