查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 「深層生態學」的自我實現與自我解構--環境倫理學「整體論」與佛法觀點的回應(之二)
- 斯賓諾莎與深層生態學之間--以自然、自我實現的概念作為連結的論述
- 「離於二邊,說於中道」-- 「大地倫理」之環境整體論與佛法觀點的回應(之一)
- 佛教與西方環境倫理學之整體論的對比--以深層生態學為例
- 史學及社會科學的整體論與個體論
- 理情行為治療法在個人自我實現之應用
- 從人性尊嚴和自我實現的觀點談Mosston教學光譜之包含式
- A Female Quest for Self-Actualization: Willa Cather's My Antonia
- 馬克思平等觀的析評
- 「當代新道家」與「深層生態學」的形上基礎
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 「深層生態學」的自我實現與自我解構--環境倫理學「整體論」與佛法觀點的回應(之二)=Self-realization and Self-deconstruction in Deep Ecology: A Response to the Holism of Environmental Ethics and the Buddhist Viewpoints Within (II) |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 釋昭慧; | 書刊名 | 法印學報 |
卷期 | 6 2016.04[民105.04] |
頁次 | 頁1-24 |
專輯 | 臺灣環境倫理之宗教視野 |
分類號 | 220.16 |
關鍵詞 | 整體論; 個體論; 大地倫理; 深層生態學; 淺層生態學; 自我實現; 生命中心平等說; 普遍的共生; 自然主義的謬誤; 環境法西斯主義; Holism; Individualism; Land ethic; Deep ecology; Shallow ecology; Self-realization; Biocentric equalitarianism; Universal symbiosis; Naturalistic fallacy; Ecofascism; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 西方環境「整體論」(holism)面對著兩種嚴厲的指責——「自然主義的謬誤」與「環境法西斯主義」。整體論者被指責,依於這套邏輯,個體權益將在追求整體最大效益的情況下受到犧牲。 本文探討「深層生態學」的中心思想,以上述兩項質疑,拿來檢視「深層生態學」,獲致它「可以面對這兩種質疑並予以有效化解」的結論。 深層生態學深受佛教的影響,生態界「關係的、全幅的圖像」,類似《華嚴經》的因陀羅網,生態界的每一法與一切諸法相即相入,重重無盡。「人」為價值優位的思維,在此一無限擴大而又相即相入的圖像中,徹底予以解構。 「自我實現」說雖然運用了「自我」或「大我」的詞彙,但在敘述脈絡中,「自我」反倒在無限擴大的生物多樣性與共生之中,實現出它的意義;這是一套心量無限擴大,終而達致「無我」的如理思維。從而在「一」與「一切」共生共存的實相觀照中,產生「眾生平等」而物我一體的胸懷,這是「同體大悲」的印證,與「四無量心」的修習路數較為接近。 佛教環境倫理學既是「整體論」,也是「個體論」,它可以不拘於「一合相」,超拔於「自性見」,以建構一套「離於二邊,說於中道」的系統理論 |
英文摘要 | There are two accusations that western environmental holism has faced—naturalistic fallacy and ecofascism. According to this logic, holism has been accused of sacrificing individual rights in the pursuit of the maximum benefit for the overall situation. This paper discusses the core principles of deep ecology. These two doubts that mentioned above can be used to view and draw the conclusion that deep ecology can face both challenge and effectively resolve these doubts. Influenced deeply by Buddhism, deep ecology shows us an image of ecological community “connected” and “full-sized,” similar to the Indra’s net mentioned in Flower Garland Sutra (Avataṃsaka-sūtra), an image for everything and all things in ecological community are interbe and endlessly connected. The priority thinking, “Human beings first,” is therefore entirely deconstructed in this infinite expansion and interbeing picture. Although the theory of self-realization applies the terms “self” and “greater self”, in the narrative context, the “self” actually realizes its meaning in this expanding and infinite diversity and symbionts and; this is a unlimited expansion of the mindset, and a rational thinking so that eventually achieve the realization of “non-self.” Having this symbiotic contemplation of reality—“one” and “all” coexist, self will expand his own mindset that “every sentient being as equal” and “union of self and things,” which is the proof of “integrality-like empathy,” and is closer to the practice of “four immeasurable minds.” Buddhist environmental ethic is both “holism” and “individualism”; it is not only unrestricted to “a composite” but also transcends perceive of self-nature so that it can construct a theory that “without veering to the two extremes, the Buddha expounds the teaching of the middle path.” |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。