查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 跨國侵權行為損害賠償之準據法--適用範圍的幾項問題=Applicable Law of Remedy in Transnational Tort--On Some Issues in Remedy |
---|---|
作者 | 賴淳良; Lai, Chun-liang; |
期刊 | 法學叢刊 |
出版日期 | 20160400 |
卷期 | 61:2=242 2016.04[民105.04] |
頁次 | 頁71-96 |
分類號 | 579.92 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 跨國侵權行為; 損害賠償; 賠償項目; 賠償數額; 程序問題; 事實問題; Transnational tort; Remedy; Heads of damages; Quantification of damages; Issue of procedure; Issue of fact; |
中文摘要 | 跨國侵權行為之準據法,是現代國際私法選法理論改革的重心。侵權行為之損害賠償,包含損害賠償之方法、項目、數額核定、各種減免賠償責任之規定或約定、法院裁量等等,均屬實務上常見之爭議問題。這些爭議問題是否均應適用臺灣涉外民事法律適用法第 25 條,有必要參酌各國法例,俾界定之。本文認為如果侵權行為損害賠償涉及賠償項目、賠償方法,非財產損害應否賠償,應適用侵權行為損害賠償選法規則。如果涉及賠償數額之認定,應由法院調查證據、認定實際損害,決定應賠償之金額。 |
英文摘要 | The Applicable law of transnational tort is the gravity of reform of internationalprivatelaw theory. Remedy in tort, including measures, heads of damaged, quantification of damages, limitation or exclusion of liability, the discretion of judge, arecommonlycontroversialissues in practice. Whetherthesecontroversialissues should be defined to Section25 of the “Law Governing the Application of Laws to Civil Matters Involving Foreign Elements” of Taiwan or not? It could learn from practices and theories of other country. This paper argues thatthe remedy issues in transnational tort, such as measures, heads of damages, shall be categorized as the remedy of choice-of-law rules of tort. Whereas the quantification of damagesissues should be categorized as issue of fact. While it is a issue of fact, it should be up to the evidences rendered by plaintiff and defendant. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。