頁籤選單縮合
題名 | The Establishment and Development of Chinese Aesthetics as a Modern Study=作為中國近代獨立學科之美學的成立與發展(1897~1949) |
---|---|
作者 | 徐希定; Seo, Hee-jung; |
期刊 | 儒教文化研究 |
出版日期 | 20160200 |
卷期 | 25 2016.02[民105.02] |
頁次 | 頁75-96 |
分類號 | 180 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 近現代學科; 感性學; 中國美學; 美學; Modern studies; Sensuous cognition; Sinnlichkeit; Aesthetics; Chinese aesthetics; |
中文摘要 | 本文旨在對作為中國近代獨立學科之美學的成立與發展進行批判性攷察,闡明當代中國美學學科研究對象的特殊性,並試圖從根本上揭示其癥結之所在。 “美學 ”是近代以後,作為哲學的一個分支學科而出現的新學科,具有 “以感性認識為研究對象 ”這一極為明確的特點。就其根本而言,美學實質上仍是將哲學思維作為其根基的。與此同時,由於藝術具有與感性直接相關的特殊性,故而美學研究與藝術之間也存有極為密切的聯係。然而,本論所探討的所謂 “中國的美學 ”,在其學科成立與發展過程中,迺至於在其研究對象與範疇上,都與西方的 “美學 ”(aesthetics)大相徑庭。西方的 “美學”是沿襲西方哲學傳統,在社會、學科的近代化過程中逐步發展而來的,以感性認識為研究對象的學科。而中國語境下的 “美學 ”學科,則是在中國近代化過程中從西方藉鑒引進而來的。中國的 “美學 ”所關註的問題本身實質上與西方傳統的 “美學 ”學科有著全然不同的根源。從而,在西方的美學學科進入到中國傳統思維模式與思想體系的過程之中,便出現了諸多摩擦、交鋒與碰撞。其結果迺是,逐漸形成了當下所謂 “中國式美學 ”之獨特的研究形態,而這一研究形態實質上並不符合西方固有的 “美學 ”學科本身,從而致使中國的美學學科陷入了某種程度上的迷茫與困頓。基於如此的處境,本論文將在對中國美學學科的成立與發展進行批判性攷察的基礎上,來探討中國的美學學科如何達到 “學術認同性 ”(academic identity)這一問題。從而揭示出中國的美學學科成為嚴格意義上獨立學科的可能性,並試圖探尋中國美學的發展出路與前景。 |
英文摘要 | The ultimate aim of this paper is to track how research in the field of aesthetics has recently come to greater prominence in China and to explore how aesthetics might establish itself as a significant field within the Chinese academic system. “Aesthetics” which has emerged as a branch of philosophy during modern times, has a definite purpose and range of study: “Cognition of the truth through human sensibility”. Aesthetics is fundamentally rooted in the structure of philosophical thought, and has a particularly intimate relationship with art, which is directly linked to sensible perception. Since modern Chinese studies on aesthetics have progressed rapidly during the process of modernization, it was probably inevitable that the acceptance of the field would produce considerable friction and compromise, particularly since it is a relatively new branch of inquiry in the Chinese intellectual tradition. In contemporary China, the study of aesthetics has become mired in conflict and lost much of its developmental direction. The unique growth process of the academic system, which is directly connected to modern Chinese history, has played a crucial role in the development of aesthetics as a field of inquiry in the Chinese intellectual tradition. Hence, this paper examines the identity of Chinese aesthetics and explores the basis on which it might be established as a rigorous science, suggesting a way forward for the development of so-called “Chinese Aesthetics” which would employ the method of critical review as the field further grows and matures. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。