頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從旅遊書寫觀點比較李渝的小說:〈江行初雪〉、〈豪傑們〉、以及〈待鶴〉=Comparing Li Yi's Stories--"First Snow Falling on the River", "Heroines", and "Waiting for Cranes"--From the Perspective of Travel Writing |
---|---|
作 者 | 趙嵐音; | 書刊名 | 中科大學報 |
卷期 | 2:1 2015.12[民104.12] |
頁次 | 頁1-21 |
分類號 | 823.6 |
關鍵詞 | 旅遊書寫; 李渝; 江行初雪; 豪傑們; 待鶴; Travel writing; Li Yu; Heroines; First Snow Falling on the River; Waiting for Cranes; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 海倫‧卡爾指出,十九世紀的旅遊作品描述旅遊地的珍奇見聞,二十世紀的旅遊書寫轉變為比較主觀的類型,常常成為西方現代主義大師們喜歡撰寫的文類。分類「旅遊書寫」時,西方學者將其視為散佈於一條長線上的各種不同作品。左端是為了探險、宗教朝聖、或經濟目的為主的旅遊書寫,敘事者以順時間順序、客觀、如實的方式描述旅遊地的風俗民情,並隱藏敘事者的想法與各種反應。而在長線的右端是被稱為自傳式旅遊書寫的旅遊文學,聚焦於自我分析與自我發現上。凱西‧布藍騰將這種探索旅遊者內心世界的旅行稱為心理或象徵性旅遊。被大部份學者歸類為現代主義小說家的李渝,撰寫旅遊小說作品毋寧是極其自然的事情。李渝的〈江行初雪〉、〈豪傑們〉和〈待鶴〉三篇小說都是比較靠近長線右端的自傳式旅遊書寫。但是,相較起來,〈江行初雪〉和〈豪傑們〉離長線的右端稍遠,而〈待鶴〉則逼近長線的右端。前兩者為社會寫實之作,主要評論旅遊地所引發的社會與生命議題;而後者則是心理旅遊小說,探索剖析旅遊者的個人思想、感受、記憶和想像,旅遊地只是用來烘托旅遊者心靈世界的背景。本論文將以上述西方學者之旅遊書寫理論做為基本架構,分析比較李渝這三篇小說的內容與寫作技巧。 |
英文摘要 | Helen Carr asserts that travel writing in the 19th Century depicted unusual things travelers saw and heard on their journeys, whereas that in the 20th Century was transformed into a more subjective form, and frequently was a genre loved by well-known Western Modernist writers. In categorizing travel writing, Western scholars frequently consider it as a genre comprising a variety of works scattering widely on a long line. At the left end of the line are works mainly concerning travels aimed at exploration, pilgrimages, and economic interests. In this type of writing, the narrator describes chronologically his/her journey in an objective, and realistic manner, depicting the people, things, events and customs that he/she witnessed on the journey. The narrator’s thoughts and reactions are purposely concealed. At the other end are autobiographic travel literary works, focusing on self-analysis and self-exploration. Casey Blanton names this type of travel “Psychological or Symbolic Journey”. It is natural for Li Yu, an acknowledged Modernist writer, to create travel fiction. Her works, “First Snow Falling on the River”, “Heroines” and “Waiting for Cranes” are all autobiographical travel stories, close to the right end of the line. Nevertheless, the first two are social realistic stories discussing social and life issues triggered by what the traveler saw and heard in the places visited. They are relatively farer from the right end. The third one is a psychological travel story, focusing on the narrator’s thoughts, feelings, memories and imagination. The place visited is simply a background bringing about his/her interior changes. The third story is thus extremely close to the right end. This essay will employ the aforementioned theories in comparing and analyzing the contents and writing techniques of these three stories -- “First Snow Falling on the River”, “Heroines” and “Waiting for Cranes”. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。