查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 胚胎植入前遺傳診斷之可罰性爭議--評析德國法之新發展=The Controversy on the Punishment of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis: A Review and Analysis of the New Development of German Law |
---|---|
作 者 | 薛智仁; | 書刊名 | 成大法學 |
卷 期 | 21 2011.06[民100.06] |
頁 次 | 頁95-141 |
分類號 | 412.21 |
關鍵詞 | 胚胎植入前遺傳診斷; 德國胚胎保護法; 濫用生殖科技罪; 濫用人類胚胎罪; 體外人類胚胎; 意圖概念; Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis; German's Embryo Protection Act; Reproductive technology abuse; Abuse of human embryo; In vitro human embryo; Intent; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 胚胎植入前遺傳診斷(PGD)在德國法上是否被禁止,自該國胚胎保護法制訂以來,便爭論不斷,德國聯邦最高法院於二○一○年七月六日首次表態,承認以篩檢重大遺傳疾病為目的之PGD具有合法性。本文在介紹此一法律爭議之背景及該判決的內容以外,也嘗試從刑法學角度分析該判決的妥當性。本文認為,PGD可罰性是一個全新型態的問題,無法援引德國現行法體系所顯示的價值決定來解決,聯邦最高法院據以肯定其合法性的理由,在釋義學角度上有商榷的餘地。儘管如此,從PGD僅是協助受術婦女合法決定是否移植胚胎的手段來看,該判決的結論具有刑事政策上的合理性。德國立法者在未來是否會跟隨聯邦最高法院的立場,則有待觀察。 |
英文摘要 | It has been a controversial issue as to whether the pre- implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is prohibited under the German legal system after the promulgation of its Embryo Protection Act. The Federal Court of Justice of Germany (BGH) rendered a verdict on this issue for the first time on July 6 2010. It recognized the legality of the PGD for the purpose of detecting serious inheritable diseases. This article, in addition to introducing the back ground of this legal con-troversy and the verdict, will try to analyze the validity of the verdict from criminological perspective. This article argues that the punishment of the PGD is a completely new issue and cannot be solved by applying the value indicated in the current German legal system. The ground that the BGH based upon to recognize the legality of the PGD is doubtful in terms of methodology. Nevertheless, the conclusion of the verdict is appropriate from the perspective of criminal justice as the PGD provides women a legal means to decide whether to have an implantation. It remains to be seen whether the German Parliament will adopt the BGH's point of view. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。