頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從中共政法體系論「十八屆三中全會」後的司法體制改革=On Judicial System Reform after “The 3rd Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee”: From the Political and Legal System in China |
---|---|
作者 | 李浩銘; | 書刊名 | 人文社會學報. 國立臺灣科技大學 |
卷期 | 11:3 2015.09[民104.09] |
頁次 | 頁215-235 |
分類號 | 589.1 |
關鍵詞 | 司法體制改革; 司法權獨立; 公檢法; 勞動教養制度; 司法權去地方化; Judiciary system reform; Judicial independence; Gongjianfa; Laojiao system; Delocalization of judiciary; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 中共中央總書記習近平在十八屆三中全會上提出深化司法體制改革。本文旨在探討深化司法體制改革對中國大陸司法權獨立運作的影響。透過對中國大陸公檢法制度及其理論進行次級資料分析,並對相關法規和官方文件進行文本分析。研究發現,各地起訴和審判機關因對案件缺乏主導力而導致判決的公正性備受質疑。其次為中共當局堅持黨對司法體制發展的領導地位。特別是其地方檢察院、法院在財務和人事均受制於同級黨委領導下更無自主性可言。所幸在2013年11月勞教制度的廢止使刑案受審理的機會增加,而司法權去地方化則有助於降低地方黨政勢力干預司法運作。然而,只要中共當局始終堅持黨國體制,除非各級領導都具有崇高的道德操守,否則未來仍會有黨的幹部假領導公檢法之名行濫權之實。是故,這次司法體制改革依舊無從根治結構性問題。 |
英文摘要 | Xi Jinping, general secretary of the CPC, announced the reform of the judicial system at the third Plenary Session of the eighteenth CPC Central Committee. This article is to discuss the judicial system reform's impact on the operation of judicial independence in China. The researcher took secondary data analysis on the judicial system of China, known as Gongjianfa, and did a contextual analysis on related legislation and official documents. It is found that there are some unfair judgments because not only do the prosecutors and the judges not have the power to investigate most of the criminal cases, but also they cannot hold power independently. Moreover, the Chinese communist authorities still insist that the development of the legal system must be under the leadership of the CPC and the budgets and personnel of the regional judiciaries are controlled by the local party committees at the corresponding level, so they have no autonomy at all. However, after abolishing the re-education through labor system, known as the Laojiao system, in November 2013, the criminal suspects have more opportunities to go to trial so political interference would be further suppressed in the local judicial system if the delocalization of the judiciary is truly implemented. However, judicial independence will not be accomplished if the CPC insists on the party-state system because the cadres of the CPC can still lead or direct in politics and therefore interfere with justice. As a result, this judiciary system reform still cannot fundamentally solve the structural problem of the judiciary system in China. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。