查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 以TOPSIS法評估室內設計圖=TOPSIS to Assess the Interior Design Diagrams |
---|---|
作者 | 呂文堯; 陳葶栩; 張震鐘; | 書刊名 | 技術學刊 |
卷期 | 30:3 2015.09[民104.09] |
頁次 | 頁151-161 |
分類號 | 422 |
關鍵詞 | 層級分析法; 偏好順序評價法; 模糊德菲法; 評圖; AHP; TOPSIS; Fuzzy Delphi method; Diagrams assessment; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文旨在以層級分析法(analytic hierarchy process, AHP)結合偏好順序評價法(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution, TOPSIS)來進行室內設計評圖,以解決教師間見仁見智的評分標準所衍生的不公平評分現象。本研究由現有的參考文獻中取得6個室內設計評圖準則。本文先以模糊德菲法來檢核專家們對於每一評圖準則是否已取得共識。本文採用AHP結合TOPSIS法來進行學生評圖成績之排名。研究結果顯示,在確認本研究各項評圖準則時,模糊德菲法確實可迅速、有效地取得各專家之共識。相較於傳統評圖方法,本文所建議之方法可以得到較合理之評圖結果。 |
英文摘要 | This study aims to evaluate the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to assess the interior design diagrams. It can solve the situation of different opinions and evaluations among teachers. Six criteria to assess the interior design diagrams will be obtained from available references. The Fuzzy Delphi Method is used to judge whether a consensus is achieved among experts on each assessment criterion. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) integrated TOPSIS is used to determine the rankings of the students. The present study indicates that the consensus among experts on each assessment criterion can be quickly and effectively acquired using the Fuzzy Delphi Method. AHP integrated TOPSIS can obtain more reasonable results than those of the traditional assessment. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。