頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 為何不需要一個世界政府?--霍布斯論國際關係與自然狀態的(不)完美類比=Why not a World Government? Thomas Hobbes on a (Dis)qualified Analogy between State of Nature and International Relations |
---|---|
作者 | 周家瑜; | 書刊名 | 人文及社會科學集刊 |
卷期 | 27:3 2015.09[民104.09] |
頁次 | 頁445-470 |
分類號 | 570.941 |
關鍵詞 | 霍布斯; 平等; 虛榮之心; 世界政府; 國際關係; Hobbes; Equality; Vain-glory; World government; International relations; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文的問題意識在於:為何證成了國內主權者的霍布斯,未能繼續完成其世界政府的推論,以及這是否是一個邏輯上的不一致。一般論者的回答可分兩種:一、認為行為主體(國家與個人)的差異使得國際政治領域遠較原初自然狀態緩和,因此不需要一個作為超級利維坦的世界政府;二、差異存在於行為主體之間的關係。本文主要論證為:這兩種回答均有不足之處,若是深入檢視霍布斯對於原初自然狀態的論述,本文試圖指出:原初自然狀態中的「人人認為自己較他人優越」的心態平等為回答此一疑問的關鍵。 |
英文摘要 | In order to answer the long-standing question of why Hobbes does not justify a world government as a super-Leviathan, this paper examines Hobbes's accounts of international relations and the pre-civil state of nature. One common view tends to emphasize the differences between "the agents" in these two realms, namely states as artificial persons and individuals as natural persons; the other common view emphasizes the differences of "the relations between the agents". By re-examining Hobbes's account of the pre-civil state of nature, I argue that both of these common views are not sufficient. This essay intends to argue that if Hobbes's assumption of equality about the original state of nature is re-examined, it can be seen that what actually causes a state of war is not so much the equal ability of men as men's common tendency of considering themselves superior to others, namely vain-glory. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。