查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 文化權體系之初探--以歐洲人權法院之判決為核心=A Primary Study on Framework of Culture Rights--With a Focus on the Cases of the European Court of Human Rights |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 許炳華; | 書刊名 | 法學叢刊 |
卷期 | 60:2=238 2015.04[民104.04] |
頁次 | 頁39-81 |
分類號 | 581.23 |
關鍵詞 | 文化權; 藝術表達之權利; 近用文化; 文化認同之權利; 語言權; 受教育權; 探尋歷史; 真相之權利; 學術自由; 保護文化暨自然遺產; 表現自由; Cultural rights; Right to artistic expression; Access to culture; Right to cultural identity; Linguistic rights; Right to education; Right to seek historical truth; Academic freedom; Protection of cultural and natural heritage; Freedom of expression; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 歐洲人權公約雖未針對「文化權」明文加以保護,然歐洲人權法院以案例法的解釋模式,透過歐洲人權公約明文規定之第 8 條尊重隱私暨家庭生活條款、第 9 條宗教自由條款、第 10 條表現自由條款及同公約第一議定書第 2 條之受教育權條款來形成保護文化權之屏障,而隱隱具體化文化權內涵之體系,包括藝術表達之權利、近用文化、文化認同之權利、語言權、受教育權、探尋歷史真相之權利、學術自由、保護文化暨自然遺產,透過一個一個詮釋文化權之案例,累積集合而成之圖像,交互勾勒出具有生命力文化權之面向,這些面向有時無法互相明確區隔,容或有重疊之處,另外前開大多數案例有一個共通意義-保障少數族群,不管是文化、語言或種族之少數族群,應足供未來立法及發展之基石。本文參考歐洲人權法院 2011 年 1 月以案例法的方式所羅列文化權之範疇,嚐試進行再細緻化個別之內涵,以期能經由該等判決形成文化權初步之體系。 |
英文摘要 | The European Convention does not explicitly protect cultural rights, but through a dynamic interpretation of the different articles of the Convention, has gradually recognised substantive rights which may fall under the notion of “cultural rights” in a broad sense. The provisions mostly invoked in relation to cultural rights are Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), Article 9 (freedom of thought, conscience and religion) and Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the Convention, as well as Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 (right to education). Another factor which may explain the growing importance of cultural rights in the Court’s case-law is the protection of minorities, including cultural, linguistic or ethnic minorities. These cases describe different areas dealing with cultural rights, covering issues such as right to artistic expression, access to culture, right to cultural identity, linguistic rights, right to education, protection of cultural and natural heritage, right to seek historical truth and academic freedom. These areas are interconnected and it is sometimes difficult to separate one from the other, which provide a basis for future litigation and development. This article, introduces relevant cases, hoping to establish primary framework of cultural rights. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。